- From: Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:57:33 -0400
- To: public-owl-wg <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Seems my previous mail was incomplete (due to some problem on my phone), thus I have it resent by a proxy. ========== I would like to have my proxy votes (as RPI official stance per AC's instruction) to all the four proposals as given in [1] * PROPOSED: the name of the rdf:text datatype be changed to rdf:PlainLiteral +1 * PROPOSED: rdf:text: A Datatype for RDF Plain Literals is ready for publication as a Candidate Recommendation +1 * PROPOSED: go ahead with publication of Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax, Mapping to RDF Graphs, Direct Semantics, RDF-Based Semantics, Conformance, Profiles and XML Serialization as Candidate Recommendations as per last week's resolution based on the CR exit criteria and with name change from rdf:text to rdf:PlainLiteral RPI will vote * +1, if the WG accepts the RPI proposal on new CR criteria [2], otherwise * -1, and we reserve our right to object formally later in the process if it is not changed - this is not because we oppose the design, but because we think the current wording is too vague and not easily checked. * PROPOSED: Quick Reference Guide is ready for publication as a Last Call Working Draft +1 [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.2009.05.27/Agenda [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2009May/0319.html
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 16:58:06 UTC