Re: general stuff about rdf:text / rdf:PlainLiteral / ... from Peter F.Patel-Schneider on 2009-05-24 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from May 2009)

From: Peter F.Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 14:17:12 -0400
To: <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
CC: <sandro@w3.org>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20090524.141712.111480875.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: general stuff about rdf:text / rdf:PlainLiteral / ... 
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 11:41:57 -0500

[...]

> If people are going to be bent of of shape because of rdf:text, for  
> whatever reason, fine. Kill it for all I personally care (at the  
> moment). But it's really bizarre to present it as a huge interop  
> problem. It's not. It uses existing mechanisms in a standard way. It's  
> easy to adapt too. For most people, nothing need change at all. I  
> don't mind encouraging the "nothing changes" perspective, but I could  
> go either way.

Precisely.  

[...]

peter

Received on Sunday, 24 May 2009 18:33:07 UTC