- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:34:07 -0400
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Ok, this works: See http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/OWL_XML_Schema_test_include2 for how to include. Schema raw, is in http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/OWL_XML_Schema_test You get raw schema with http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/OWL_XML_Schema_test?action=raw -Alan On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote: > On 19 May 2009, at 20:15, Sandro Hawke wrote: > >>> On 19 May 2009, at 19:03, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: >>> >>>> I think this can be worked around by instead of wrapping the schema in >>>> <pre> tags, instead putting a space in front of each line in the >>>> source that doesn't already start with a space. >>> >>> I already tried this and pretty much every other way. It doesn't >>> produce acceptable results. Don't bother. >>> >>>> The whitespace should be ignored by schema readers, and the initial >>>> space forces the line to be preformatted. >>>> >>>> I'm still looking for a cleaner solution. >>> >>> The simple solution is to pick a different W3.org temporary URI for >>> the download and copy the schema there after stripping off the URI. I >>> don't see why this can't be done :) >> >> I'm not sure I fully understand, but yes, let's stop fighting with the >> wiki. I'm guessing someone should maintain the master copy of the >> schema. And they should: >> >> - paste it into whatever wiki page(s) it need(s) to be in, quoted >> as necessary, whenever it changes; >> >> - send me a new copy to put at the namespace, whenever necessary. >> >> The live-from-the-wiki trick seemed worth a try, but it's not worth a >> lot of hassle. > > The current live-from-the-wiki schema is, minus the pre tags, *the* current > schema. So could you put it where you're going to put it? > > Once I have that uri, I can update the wiki page with the new download link. > > If it's cvs controlled, I suppose I could take over managing it directly. > > Cheers, > Bijan. > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2009 19:35:03 UTC