- From: Sebastian Rudolph <rudolph@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>
- Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 12:17:53 +0200
- To: Mike Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com>
- Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <F403BBC3-5BD0-4270-AA09-BD8D09207C4F@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Dear Mike, thank you again for your efforts. Meanwhile, we have addressed your comments (and responded to them mainly by editor's notes). The diff http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Primer&diff=23543&oldid=23518 contains the editorial changes made to Sections 1 - 8. Some more comments on Sections 9 and 10: > Review comment from MikeSmith 01:35, 13 May 2009 (UTC) This section > conflates DL / Full as languages and Direct / RDF as semantics. I > think that it should be reworked to be more careful about the > distinction. For instance, it is not clear from the text that it is > perfectly valid to apply the RDF based semantics to an OWL 2 DL > ontology We have rewritten this section and we think it's much clearer now. Diff for Section 9: <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Primer&diff=23689&oldid=23628 > Note, however, that applying the RDF based semantics to an OWL 2 DL ontology does not amount to exactly the same as applying the direct semantics - we have also added a remark on this. > Review comment from MikeSmith 01:49, 13 May 2009 (UTC) I suggest > removing complexity class information and links to the literature > (and origins) from the profile descriptions in the subsections. The > target audience of this document does not need this level of detail, > it is difficult to present in a way all members of the wg will > endorse, and it is already present in the Profiles document. We have done this, i.e. we have taken out the respective parts. > Review comment from MikeSmith 01:38, 13 May 2009 (UTC) Previous > comments about "allow to" apply to the preceding paragraph. Okay and done. Diff for Section 10: <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Primer&diff=23695&oldid=23689 > Best regards Sebastian Am 13.05.2009 um 03:54 schrieb Mike Smith: > I have completed my review of the Primer. My full set of review > comments can be seen in the diff at [1]. Most of my comments were > minor editorial issues. My comments in sections 9 (DL and Full) and > 10 (Profiles) suggest more substantial changes. > -- > Mike Smith > > Clark & Parsia > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Primer&diff=23495&oldid=23464 > _________________________________________________ Dr. Sebastian Rudolph Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe, D-76128 Karlsruhe rudolph@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de phone +49 (0)721 608 7362 www.sebastian-rudolph.de fax +49 (0)721 608 5998
Received on Saturday, 16 May 2009 10:19:11 UTC