- From: Peter F.Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:15:33 -0400
- To: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
- CC: <sandro@w3.org>, <schneid@fzi.de>, <cgolbrei@gmail.com>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Sandro will set up his set of hoops at some point, and then we can jump through them. :-) peter From: Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov> Subject: Re: Check links Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 09:09:42 -0500 > All, > > I manually checked the links in NF&R earlier in the week. Are we > confident that > correct wiki links will generate correct html links, or will we have to > re-check the > links in the html rendering of these docs? More generally, what do we > expect that > the editors of the documents will need to do between now and actual > publication > and when? > > -Evan > > Michael Schneider wrote: >> Hi! >> >> The NF&R document seems to be hit particularly hard by the problem Peter >> reported earlier this day. NF&R contains many deep-links into other >> documents, and the CheckLinks tool claims that many of these links (or more >> precisely: their fragments) are broken. However, from the sample of links >> that I checked manually, it looks to me that they are all fine. >> >> CheckLinks should really be fixed soon. >> >> Michael >
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2009 14:16:18 UTC