- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:03:41 -0400
- To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
I think this can be worked around by instead of wrapping the schema in <pre> tags, instead putting a space in front of each line in the source that doesn't already start with a space. The whitespace should be ignored by schema readers, and the initial space forces the line to be preformatted. I'm still looking for a cleaner solution. -Alan On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Michael Grove <mike@clarkparsia.com> >> Date: 19 May 2009 17:01:03 BDT >> To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> >> Cc: Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com> >> Subject: Re: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization >> >> Yeah, I sent a message to the list yesterday saying it looked ok, but I >> got the bounce saying it needed moderator approval. I guess it's still >> waiting for that. >> >> It looks fine. The only thing I noticed was the same thing that Rinke >> brought up, the schema downloads wrapped in a pre tag which is probably not >> what the intent is. But other than that, it's ok. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Mike >> >> On May 19, 2009, at 11:58 AM, Ian Horrocks wrote: >> >>> Did you get a chance to look at it yet? We are hoping to have a vote on >>> moving to CR on Wednesday. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ian >>> >>> >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>>> From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> >>>> Date: 16 May 2009 15:58:21 BDT >>>> To: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@few.vu.nl>, mike@clarkparsia.com >>>> Cc: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, Kendall Clark >>>> <kendall@clarkparsia.com> >>>> Subject: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization >>>> >>>> Dear Rinke and Mike, >>>> >>>> As LC1 reviewers of XML Serialization can you please take a *very* quick >>>> look at the latest version and confirm that you are OK with any minor >>>> changes that may have occurred since the 1st Last Call and that, in your >>>> opinion, the document is "CR-ready". >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ian >>>> >>> >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2009 18:04:41 UTC