- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 21:24:29 +0100
- To: Peter F.Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <schneid@fzi.de>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
I also agree: the change is essentially editorial, and you discussed and agreed it at last week's teleconf. I changed "have changed" to "will change" as suggested by Peter. I am happy for the response can be sent forthwith. Thanks, Ian On 17 May 2009, at 20:44, Peter F.Patel-Schneider wrote: > From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de> > Subject: New draft for JC5 > Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 06:55:55 -0500 > >> Hi! >> >> After my private discussion with TQ concerning the annotation >> vocabulary, I have created a new draft >> >> <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC2_Responses/JC5> >> >> I believe that we will need to first vote on the renaming of the >> vocabulary terms, then do the changes in the documents (several >> documents are involved), and only then sent the response to Jeremy. I >> think, we can do the changes and sending the response on Wednesday >> after the TQ, and do our voting into CR modulo these changes. Given >> the (un-official) positive feedback by TQ, this should not lead to >> problems. >> >> Michael > > I agree with Bijan and think that you can send it earlier. (You might > want to say "will change" instead of "changed".) There was discussion > at the last TC and I don't see any dissent. We can officially vote on > Wednesday. > > peter >
Received on Sunday, 17 May 2009 20:25:11 UTC