- From: Peter F.Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:55:06 -0400
- To: <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- CC: <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, <mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>, <evren@clarkparsia.com>
From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Status of OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:28:50 -0500 > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Peter F.Patel-Schneider > <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote: >> I'm not sure what part of the documents you are basing this behaviour >> on. As far as I can see our documents leave it completely up to >> implementations as to how they are to implement the relationship between >> rdf:text literals and plain literals, and this is how it should be. > > In this message from Sandro he asserts that it was a requirement of HP > for moving to last call that rdf:text literals do not "escape" into > RDF. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-text/2009AprJun/0077.html > > -Alan Sure, but why should this affect any document except the rdf:text document? Our relevant documents defer to rdf:text, which is only appropriate. peter
Received on Monday, 18 May 2009 20:55:14 UTC