Re: [LC response] To Richard H. McCullough from Peter F.Patel-Schneider on 2009-05-14 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from May 2009)

From: Peter F.Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 14:06:08 -0400
To: <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
CC: <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20090514.140608.30116089.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

I'll send it out tomorrow (Friday).

peter

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [LC response] To Richard H. McCullough
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:34:00 +0100

> Seems fine to me. Not hearing anything to the contrary I suggest sending
> it forthwith.
> 
> Ian
> 
> 
> On 14 May 2009, at 01:07, Peter F.Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
>> See http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC2_Responses/RHM1-2 for a draft
>> second response.
>>
>> peter
>>
>

Received on Thursday, 14 May 2009 18:05:34 UTC