- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 10:37:07 -0400
- To: Mike Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com>
- Cc: Sebastian Rudolph <rudolph@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>, W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Mike Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 07:24, Sebastian Rudolph > <rudolph@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de> wrote: > >> Just a thought on your first comment: >> "The use of the word "individual" in the first sentence of the preceding >> paragraph may present problems for users new to OWL. They are likely to >> think individual refers to a single person." >> >> ...would "object" be more appropriate? Unfortunately, "entity" is already >> reserved for syntactic ontology elements and should not be used. > > Yes, "object" addresses my concern, but I prefer Sandro's suggestion of "thing". As do I. -Alan > > -- > Mike Smith > > Clark & Parsia > >
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2009 14:38:03 UTC