Re: [LC response] To Richard H. McCullough

On 14 May 2009, at 10:28, Rinke Hoekstra wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Richards' comment requests us to add a definition to the Primer. I  
> agree with Peter that the Primer should not contain crazy talk.  
> Furthermore, this definition is adequately present in both the  
> Direct Semantics and the RDF-Based Semantics document.
>
> Rather than attempting to explain the meaning of 'Class', I think a  
> reference to these documents will suffice.

Sounds good to me.

Cheers,
Bijan.

Received on Thursday, 14 May 2009 09:32:56 UTC