- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:54:14 -0400
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Unfortunately, the problem with getting false-positive reports of broken
links from the link checker seems to be sporadic. We haven't been able
to reproduce it reliably.
The good side of that is that the new link check reports look much
better. There may still be false positives in it, but as I randomly
tried bits of it, I only found one [1]/
So please look over the checklinks outputs here:
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/checks
Thanks!
- Sandro
[1] NFR links to http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Who_Reads_Our_Documents#Database_Federation_Engineer . I believe this link is correct, but falsely reported as a problem.
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2009 16:54:23 UTC