Re: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization

That requires messing with the XML Schema itself, which may not be the
best idea, even though whitespace is ignored by readers.  

I would have hoped that there would be an include verbatim thing in
MediaWiki.

peter


From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:03:41 -0500

> I think this can be worked around by instead of wrapping the schema in
> <pre> tags, instead putting a space in front of each line in the
> source that doesn't already start with a space.
> 
> The whitespace should be ignored by schema readers, and the initial
> space forces the line to be preformatted.
> 
> I'm still looking for a cleaner solution.
> 
> -Alan
> 
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Ian Horrocks
> <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: Michael Grove <mike@clarkparsia.com>
>>> Date: 19 May 2009 17:01:03 BDT
>>> To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
>>> Cc: Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
>>> Subject: Re: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization
>>>
>>> Yeah, I sent a message to the list yesterday saying it looked ok, but I
>>> got the bounce saying it needed moderator approval.  I guess it's still
>>> waiting for that.
>>>
>>> It looks fine.  The only thing I noticed was the same thing that Rinke
>>> brought up, the schema downloads wrapped in a pre tag which is probably not
>>> what the intent is.  But other than that, it's ok.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> On May 19, 2009, at 11:58 AM, Ian Horrocks wrote:
>>>
>>>> Did you get a chance to look at it yet? We are hoping to have a vote on
>>>> moving to CR on Wednesday.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>
>>>>> From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
>>>>> Date: 16 May 2009 15:58:21 BDT
>>>>> To: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@few.vu.nl>, mike@clarkparsia.com
>>>>> Cc: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, Kendall Clark
>>>>> <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
>>>>> Subject: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Rinke and Mike,
>>>>>
>>>>> As LC1 reviewers of XML Serialization can you please take a *very* quick
>>>>> look at the latest version and confirm that you are OK with any minor
>>>>> changes that may have occurred since the 1st Last Call and that, in your
>>>>> opinion, the document is "CR-ready".
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Ian
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2009 18:11:15 UTC