- From: Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:45:14 -0400
- To: public-owl-wg <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Unfortunately, I will be able to attend the 1pm telcon for travel reasons. I would like to have my proxy votes (as RPI official stance per AC's instruction) to all the four proposals as given in [1] * PROPOSED: the name of the rdf:text datatype be changed to rdf:PlainLiteral +1 * PROPOSED: rdf:text: A Datatype for RDF Plain Literals is ready for publication as a Candidate Recommendation +1 * PROPOSED: go ahead with publication of Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax, Mapping to RDF Graphs, Direct Semantics, RDF-Based Semantics, Conformance, Profiles and XML Serialization as Candidate Recommendations as per last week's resolution based on the CR exit criteria and with name change from rdf:text to rdf:PlainLiteral RPI will vote * +1, if the WG acceptsthe RPI proposal on new CR criteria [2], otherwise * -1, and we reserve our right to object formally later in the process if it is not changed - this is not because we oppose the design, but because we think the current wording is too vague an
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 16:45:52 UTC