- From: Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 15:46:45 -0400
- To: "Peter F.Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
OK. I changed section 4.2 to http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Quick_Reference_Guide&oldid=24112#Additional_Vocabulary_in_OWL_2_RDF_Syntax I also added links to OWL 1 document from the 5 terms. The diff is http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Quick_Reference_Guide&diff=24112&oldid=24105 Jie On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Peter F.Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote: > As no one has strongly objected to this, I suggest that you make a > version with this change so that everyone can see just what it would > look like. > > peter > > > From: Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: status of Quick Reference Guide > Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 13:56:18 -0500 > >> The proposal is to replace the section 4.2 >> >> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Quick_Reference_Guide#Deprecated_Vocabulary_in_OWL_2 >> >> with the draft in >> >> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Talk:Quick_Reference_Guide#Additional_Vocabulary_in_OWL_2_RDF_Syntax >> >> As far as I know, that's the only thing blocks the way. >> >> Jie >> >> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Peter F.Patel-Schneider >> <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote: >>> At the OWL WG teleconference yesterday, the vote to state that the Quick >>> Reference Guide was ready for a Last Call publication did not succeed. >>> >>> I expect that there will be a new vote next week on this. >>> >>> I would like to understand, well before the next vote, just what is >>> needed to make the version of the Quick Reference Guide that is >>> currently in the Wiki (possibly with a slight upgrade of Section 4.2 to >>> mention the rest of the specially-handled OWL 2 vocabulary) acceptable >>> to the entire WG. >>> >>> Peter F. Patel-Schneider >>> Bell Labs Research > -- Jie Bao http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2009 19:47:22 UTC