- From: Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:09:42 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, Christine Golbreich <cgolbrei@gmail.com>, W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
All, I manually checked the links in NF&R earlier in the week. Are we confident that correct wiki links will generate correct html links, or will we have to re-check the links in the html rendering of these docs? More generally, what do we expect that the editors of the documents will need to do between now and actual publication and when? -Evan Michael Schneider wrote: > Hi! > > The NF&R document seems to be hit particularly hard by the problem Peter > reported earlier this day. NF&R contains many deep-links into other > documents, and the CheckLinks tool claims that many of these links (or more > precisely: their fragments) are broken. However, from the sample of links > that I checked manually, it looks to me that they are all fine. > > CheckLinks should really be fixed soon. > > Michael
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2009 14:10:40 UTC