RE: CR Exit Criteria

Ian Horrocks wrote:

>Yet another re-working of the exit criteria is now available in the
>usual place [1]. As well as adding the improved "at risk" text, it
>also separates the Full, DL and Profiles cases a little more clearly.
>For Full I now have:
>
>"At least two different implementations of an OWL 2 Full entailment
>checker implementing useful subsets of OWL Full and passing a useful
>subset of the non-DL test cases. "
>
>No doubt you will let me know if you don't like this formulation.

I'm fine with this formulation for Full.

An RL/rules reasoner (such as the one by Ivan) and the (still to 
be extended) Jena-OWL reasoners will probably count as two different
implementations of subsets of OWL Full. Further, the test 
case collection that I am building will almost entirely be non-DL. 
I am expecting that the RL and Jena reasoners will succeed on a 
relevant (and hopefully "useful" :)) subset of my tests. 

I am planning to come up with a "first-look" version of my
(not yet finished) test suite before next TC.
  
Cheers,
Michael

--
Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider
Research Scientist, Dept. Information Process Engineering (IPE)
Tel  : +49-721-9654-726
Fax  : +49-721-9654-727
Email: michael.schneider@fzi.de
WWW  : http://www.fzi.de/michael.schneider
=======================================================================
FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe
Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe
Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959
Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts, Az 14-0563.1, RP Karlsruhe
Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rüdiger Dillmann, Dipl. Wi.-Ing. Michael Flor,
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolffried Stucky, Prof. Dr. Rudi Studer
Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus
=======================================================================