- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 22:49:48 -0400
- To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Peter F.Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, schneid@fzi.de, public-owl-wg@w3.org
I concur. -Alan On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > I also agree: the change is essentially editorial, and you discussed and > agreed it at last week's teleconf. > > I changed "have changed" to "will change" as suggested by Peter. I am happy > for the response can be sent forthwith. > > Thanks, > Ian > > > > On 17 May 2009, at 20:44, Peter F.Patel-Schneider wrote: > >> From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de> >> Subject: New draft for JC5 >> Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 06:55:55 -0500 >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> After my private discussion with TQ concerning the annotation >>> vocabulary, I have created a new draft >>> >>> <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC2_Responses/JC5> >>> >>> I believe that we will need to first vote on the renaming of the >>> vocabulary terms, then do the changes in the documents (several >>> documents are involved), and only then sent the response to Jeremy. I >>> think, we can do the changes and sending the response on Wednesday >>> after the TQ, and do our voting into CR modulo these changes. Given >>> the (un-official) positive feedback by TQ, this should not lead to >>> problems. >>> >>> Michael >> >> I agree with Bijan and think that you can send it earlier. (You might >> want to say "will change" instead of "changed".) There was discussion >> at the last TC and I don't see any dissent. We can officially vote on >> Wednesday. >> >> peter >> > > >
Received on Monday, 18 May 2009 02:50:48 UTC