Re: draft responses for four JC LC comments

Hi,

On 13 mei 2009, at 08:27, Christine Golbreich wrote:

> 2) I'd suggest not to spot particular sections in NF&R; "less is more"
> here also because:
> - JC4 "improved versioning support in OWL2" is not precise
> - several sections might be relevant, in particular both sections 2
> and section 4
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/New_Features_and_Rationale#Features_.26_Rationale
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/New_Features_and_Rationale#Other_Design_Choices_and_Rationale


My review of NF&R [1] also lists a number of missing features:

On 6 mei 2009, at 12:22, Rinke Hoekstra wrote:
> * There are some features of OWL 2 (or changes wrt. OWL 1) that are  
> not listed in the current version. I identified the following:
> - imports & versioning (import by location etc.)
> - URI -> IRI
> - rdf:text
> - Manchester Syntax (is mentioned, but only as example in sections  
> 4.1 and 4.2)
> - Built-in datatypes (section 4 of Syntax)
> - ... more?

(wrt. datatypes, these are mentioned in Section 2.3.1 of NF&R, but it  
does not list all of them)

Versioning and imports are described in Section 3.1, 3.3 and 3.4 of  
Syntax, but do not appear in NF&R.

-Rinke

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2009May/0033.html

---
Drs Rinke Hoekstra

Leibniz Center for Law      |  AI Department
Faculty of Law              |  Faculty of Sciences
Universiteit van Amsterdam  |  Vrije Universiteit
Kloveniersburgwal 48        |  De Boelelaan 1081a
1012 CX  Amsterdam          |  1081 HV Amsterdam
+31-(0)20-5253499           |  +31-(0)20-5987752
hoekstra@uva.nl             |  hoekstra@few.vu.nl

Homepage: http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke

Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2009 11:13:23 UTC