- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 10:14:26 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
I checked Overview, Profiles and Conformance, and everything looks good. Ian On 21 May 2009, at 17:54, Sandro Hawke wrote: > > Unfortunately, the problem with getting false-positive reports of > broken > links from the link checker seems to be sporadic. We haven't been > able > to reproduce it reliably. > > The good side of that is that the new link check reports look much > better. There may still be false positives in it, but as I randomly > tried bits of it, I only found one [1]/ > > So please look over the checklinks outputs here: > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/checks > > Thanks! > > - Sandro > > > [1] NFR links to http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/ > Who_Reads_Our_Documents#Database_Federation_Engineer . I believe > this link is correct, but falsely reported as a problem. >
Received on Friday, 22 May 2009 09:15:09 UTC