w3c-wai-ig@w3.org from January to March 2016 by author

accessys@smart.net

• Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern? (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: Income opportunity for people with disabilities to report on web accessibility (Tuesday, 23 February)

ALAN SMITH

• RE: Allowing font size changes (Friday, 15 January)
• RE: Allowing font size changes (Friday, 15 January)
• RE: W3C to Receive Emmy® for Work on Accessible Captioning (Tuesday, 5 January)

Alistair Garrison

• Re: Allowing font size changes (Friday, 15 January)

Andrew Cunningham

• Re: PDF accessibility and complex script languages. (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: PDF accessibility and complex script languages. (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: PDF accessibility and complex script languages. (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: PDF accessibility and complex script languages. (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: PDF accessibility and complex script languages. (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: PDF accessibility and complex script languages. (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: PDF accessibility and complex script languages. (Monday, 4 January)
• PDF accessibility and complex script languages. (Monday, 4 January)

Andrew Kirkpatrick

• Re: Meaning of "synchronized media" (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: Meaning of "synchronized media" (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: Meaning of "synchronized media" (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: Call for Review: WCAG 2.0 Techniques Draft Updates (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Call for Review: WCAG 2.0 Techniques Draft Updates (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: PDF accessibility and complex script languages. (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: PDF accessibility and complex script languages. (Tuesday, 5 January)

Andy Heath

• Re: Accessible eLearning (Wednesday, 16 March)

Angela Punshon

• RE: WCAG compliance question (Friday, 26 February)

Balusani, Shirisha

• RE: W3C to Receive Emmy(R) for Work on Accessible Captioning (Wednesday, 6 January)

Bolena, Zachary

• RE: W3C to Receive Emmy® for Work on Accessible Captioning (Tuesday, 5 January)

Bryan Garaventa

• Using Visual ARIA to Physically See and Learn How ARIA Works (Tuesday, 29 March)

Chaals McCathie Nevile

• Re: WCAG compliance question (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: accessibility support for nested h1 in sections? (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: Call for Review: WCAG 2.0 Techniques Draft Updates (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Call for Review: WCAG 2.0 Techniques Draft Updates (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: accessibility support for nested h1 in sections? (Friday, 22 January)
• accessibility support for nested h1 in sections? (Friday, 22 January)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Monday, 18 January)
• Re: W3C to Receive Emmy® for Wor k on Accessible Captioning (Wednesday, 6 January)

Charudatta Jadhav

• Re: W3C to Receive Emmy® for Work on Accessible Captioning (Wednesday, 6 January)

david hilbert poehlman

• Re: W3C to Receive Emmy® for Work on Accessible Captioning (Tuesday, 5 January)

David MacDonald

• Re: Are visible labels required per WCAG 2.0? (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: What is a "WCAG2.next workshop"? (Friday, 18 March)

Denis Boudreau

• Re: Call for Review: Accessibility Requirements for People with Low Vision (Thursday, 17 March)

Druckman,Geri

• Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern? (Monday, 28 March)

Duff Johnson

• Re: PDF/UA now a US National Standard, available for $15 (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: PDF/UA now a US National Standard, available for $15 (Tuesday, 29 March)
• PDF/UA now a US National Standard, available for $15 (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: PDF accessibility and complex script languages. (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: PDF's Exposed via Web Pages and Accessibility (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: PDF accessibility and complex script languages. (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: PDF accessibility and complex script languages. (Monday, 4 January)

Durham, Heather

• Re: WCAG compliance question (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: WCAG compliance question (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: WCAG compliance question (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Friday, 15 January)

Elizabeth Pyatt

• Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern? (Monday, 28 March)

Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo

• RE: Accessible eLearning (Wednesday, 16 March)
• RE: W3C to Receive Emmy® for Work on Accessible Captioning (Tuesday, 5 January)

Felix Miata

• Re: PDF/UA now a US National Standard, available for $15 (Tuesday, 29 March)

Gavin Thomas

• RE: accessibility support for nested h1 in sections? (Friday, 22 January)

George Kerscher

• RE: Accessible eLearning (Wednesday, 16 March)
• RE: Meaning of "synchronized media" (Friday, 5 February)

Gill Whitney

• RE: Accessible eLearning (Wednesday, 16 March)

Ginger Claassen

• WCAG compliance question (Friday, 26 February)

Gordon L. Potter

• Re: WCAG compliance question (Monday, 29 February)

Greg Gay

• W4A2016 Call for Participation (Tuesday, 22 March)

Gregg Vanderheiden

• Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern? (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: Meaning of "synchronized media" (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Saturday, 23 January)

Harry Loots

• Re: Income opportunity for people with disabilities to report on web accessibility (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Income opportunity for people with disabilities to report on web accessibility (Tuesday, 23 February)

Herin Hentry

• RE: Placeholder text instead of Labels (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Placeholder text instead of Labels (Tuesday, 15 March)
• RE: W3C to Receive Emmy® for Work on Accessible Captioning (Wednesday, 6 January)

Howard Leicester

• RE: PDF/UA now a US National Standard, available for $15 (Tuesday, 29 March)
• RE: Allowing font size changes (Thursday, 14 January)
• RE: PDF's Exposed via Web Pages and Accessibility (Tuesday, 5 January)
• RE: PDF's Exposed via Web Pages and Accessibility (Tuesday, 5 January)

J. Albert Bowden

• Re: PDF/UA now a US National Standard, available for $15 (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: PDF/UA now a US National Standard, available for $15 (Tuesday, 29 March)

Jeanne Spellman

• Go ATAG! Twitter adds alternative text to images (Wednesday, 30 March)
• Minutes of WCAG.Next meeting at CSUN (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: Are visible labels required per WCAG 2.0? (Wednesday, 23 March)

Jens Oliver Meiert

• Re: W3C to Receive Emmy(R) for Work on Accessible Captioning (Tuesday, 5 January)

Jim Allan

• Re: Allowing font size changes (Wednesday, 20 January)

jnlk4@bol.com.br

• RE: Minutes of WCAG.Next meeting at CSUN (Tuesday, 29 March)

Joe Chidzik

• RE: Allowing font size changes (Monday, 18 January)

John Foliot

• What is a "WCAG2.next workshop"? (Friday, 18 March)

John Sweet

• Re: Income opportunity for people with disabilities to report on web accessibility (Tuesday, 23 February)

Jonathan Avila

• RE: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern? (Tuesday, 29 March)
• RE: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern? (Tuesday, 29 March)
• RE: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern? (Tuesday, 29 March)
• RE: Are visible labels required per WCAG 2.0? (Tuesday, 22 March)
• RE: WCAG compliance question (Wednesday, 2 March)
• RE: WCAG compliance question (Monday, 29 February)
• RE: Allowing font size changes (Thursday, 28 January)
• RE: Allowing font size changes (Tuesday, 19 January)
• RE: Allowing font size changes (Friday, 15 January)
• RE: Allowing font size changes (Friday, 15 January)
• RE: Allowing font size changes (Thursday, 14 January)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Thursday, 14 January)
• RE: W3C to Receive Emmy® for Wor k on Accessible Captioning (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: PDF's Exposed via Web Pages and Accessibility (Tuesday, 5 January)
• RE: PDF's Exposed via Web Pages and Accessibility (Tuesday, 5 January)
• RE: PDF accessibility and complex script languages. (Tuesday, 5 January)
• RE: PDF accessibility and complex script languages. (Tuesday, 5 January)

Julie Romanowski

• RE: PDF/UA now a US National Standard, available for $15 (Tuesday, 29 March)

Jutta Treviranus

• Re: Accessible eLearning (Wednesday, 16 March)

Karen Lewellen

• Re: Income opportunity for people with disabilities to report on web accessibility (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: Income opportunity for people with disabilities to report on web accessibility (Tuesday, 23 February)

Karen Sorensen

• Re: Accessible eLearning (Monday, 21 March)

Katie Haritos-Shea

• Re: Income opportunity for people with disabilities to report on web accessibility (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Income opportunity for people with disabilities to report on web accessibility (Tuesday, 23 February)

Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL

• FW: More on the affordable braille device (Wednesday, 30 March)
• RE: W3C to Receive Emmy® for Wor k on Accessible Captioning (Thursday, 7 January)
• RE: W3C to Receive Emmy® for Work on Accessible Captioning (Tuesday, 5 January)

Kevin Cole

• Re: W3C to Receive Emmy(R) for Work on Accessible Captioning (Thursday, 7 January)

Kyle Rector

• ASSETS 2016 - Call for Papers (Tuesday, 26 January)

Lewis Robinson

• Test for abuse (human) (Monday, 28 March)

lists@srinivasu.org

• Re: W3C to Receive Emmy® for Work on Accessible Captioning (Wednesday, 6 January)

Loretta Guarino Reid

• Re: PDF accessibility and complex script languages. (Monday, 4 January)

Léonie Watson

• Using the GamePad API with AT devices? (Tuesday, 23 February)

Macintosh, Kristy (OMAFRA)

• Accessible eLearning (Wednesday, 16 March)

Malamud, Mark (NIH/NHLBI) [E]

• RE: WCAG compliance question (Monday, 29 February)
• RE: WCAG compliance question (Friday, 26 February)

Michael Cooper

• Call for Review: WAI-ARIA 1.1, DPub Roles, Accessibility API Mappings, and Authoring Practices Working Drafts (Thursday, 17 March)
• Understanding WCAG & WCAG Techniques Updated March 2016 (Thursday, 17 March)
• Call for Review: WCAG 2.0 Techniques Draft Updates (Friday, 8 January)
• Call for Review: Requirements for WCAG 2.0 Extensions - First Public Working Draft (Tuesday, 5 January)

Michiel Bijl

• Re: Allowing font size changes (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Thursday, 14 January)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Thursday, 14 January)
• Re: Call for Review: WCAG 2.0 Techniques Draft Updates (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: Call for Review: WCAG 2.0 Techniques Draft Updates (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: W3C to Receive Emmy® for Work on Accessible Captioning (Tuesday, 5 January)

Mike Elledge

• Re: Accessible eLearning (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: WCAG compliance question (Saturday, 27 February)
• Re: WCAG compliance question (Saturday, 27 February)
• Re: accessibility support for nested h1 in sections? (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: accessibility support for nested h1 in sections? (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: accessibility support for nested h1 in sections? (Saturday, 23 January)

Mitchell Evan

• Re: Placeholder text instead of Labels (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: WCAG compliance question (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Saturday, 23 January)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Thursday, 14 January)

Nigel Megitt

• RE: TTML 1.0 and 2.0 (Wednesday, 20 January)

Olaf Drümmer

• Re: PDF accessibility and complex script languages. (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: PDF accessibility and complex script languages. (Wednesday, 6 January)

Oscar Cao

• RE: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern? (Monday, 28 March)
• Allowing font size changes (Thursday, 14 January)

Patrick H. Lauke

• Re: WCAG compliance question (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: Using the GamePad API with AT devices? (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: accessibility support for nested h1 in sections? (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: accessibility support for nested h1 in sections? (Friday, 22 January)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Thursday, 14 January)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Thursday, 14 January)

Patti Burke Lund

• Re: W3C to Receive Emmy® for Work on Accessible Captioning (Thursday, 7 January)

Paul Bohman

• Re: IAAP Certification begins March 22 (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: IAAP Certification begins March 22 (Monday, 15 February)
• IAAP Certification begins March 22 (Monday, 8 February)

Paul Tykodi

• RE: PDF's Exposed via Web Pages and Accessibility (Wednesday, 6 January)
• RE: PDF's Exposed via Web Pages and Accessibility (Wednesday, 6 January)
• PDF's Exposed via Web Pages and Accessibility (Tuesday, 5 January)

Phill Jenkins

• RE: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern? (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: Are visible labels required per WCAG 2.0? (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Are visible labels required per WCAG 2.0? (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: WCAG compliance question (Saturday, 27 February)
• Re: WCAG compliance question (Saturday, 27 February)
• Re: WCAG compliance question (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: WCAG compliance question (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: WCAG compliance question (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Wednesday, 20 January)
• RE: Allowing font size changes (Tuesday, 19 January)
• RE: TTML 1.0 and 2.0 (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: TTML 1.0 and 2.0 (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Monday, 18 January)
• Re: PDF's Exposed via Web Pages and Accessibility (Tuesday, 5 January)

Priti Rohra

• Re: W3C to Receive Emmy(R) for Work on Accessible Captioning (Wednesday, 6 January)

Rakesh

• Re: W3C to Receive Emmy(R) for Work on Accessible Captioning (Wednesday, 6 January)

Richard \(Userite\)

• Re: WCAG compliance question (Friday, 26 February)

Robin Hillman

• Re: Meaning of "synchronized media" (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: Meaning of "synchronized media" (Friday, 5 February)
• Meaning of "synchronized media" (Friday, 5 February)

Sailesh Panchang

• Re: Are visible labels required per WCAG 2.0? (Wednesday, 23 March)

SALES, TERRY LYNN

• RE: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern? (Monday, 28 March)
• RE: Meaning of "synchronized media" (Friday, 5 February)

Sarah Horton

• Re: Accessible eLearning (Wednesday, 16 March)

Sean Murphy (seanmmur)

• RE: Allowing font size changes (Thursday, 28 January)
• RE: TTML 1.0 and 2.0 (Tuesday, 19 January)
• TTML 1.0 and 2.0 (Tuesday, 19 January)

Sharron Rush

• Re: Income opportunity for people with disabilities to report on web accessibility (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Income opportunity for people with disabilities to report on web accessibility (Tuesday, 23 February)

Shawn Henry

• W3C WAI at CSUN - Monday, Tuesday, Friday (Friday, 18 March)
• Updated: Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools List (Thursday, 17 March)
• Updated: WCAG-EM Report Tool - Website Accessibility Evaluation Report Generator (Thursday, 17 March)
• Call for Review: Accessibility Requirements for People with Low Vision (Thursday, 17 March)
• Updated: How to Meet WCAG 2.0: A customizable quick reference (Thursday, 17 March)
• W3C to Receive Emmy® for Work on Accessible Captioning (Tuesday, 5 January)

Smith, John C.

• RE: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern? (Monday, 28 March)

Srinivasu Chakravarthula

• Re: Allowing font size changes (Thursday, 21 January)

Steve Faulkner

• Re: accessibility support for nested h1 in sections? (Sunday, 24 January)
• Re: accessibility support for nested h1 in sections? (Friday, 22 January)
• Re: accessibility support for nested h1 in sections? (Friday, 22 January)
• Re: accessibility support for nested h1 in sections? (Friday, 22 January)

Taliesin Smith

• Re: Accessible eLearning (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: Meaning of "synchronized media" (Friday, 5 February)

Tel Woolsey

• Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern? (Monday, 28 March)

TINA.JOHNS@forces.gc.ca

• RE: WCAG compliance question (Friday, 26 February)
• Recall: WCAG compliance question (Friday, 26 February)

Tobias Bengfort

• Luminance / Luma confusion (Sunday, 6 March)

Wayne Dick

• Re: Is the accessibility of a 3rd party that represent me still my concern? (Thursday, 31 March)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: Allowing font size changes (Monday, 18 January)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2016 23:33:37 UTC