- From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:26:11 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <56F2B593.8040909@spellmanconsulting.com>
On 3/22/2016 6:11 PM, Phill Jenkins wrote: > UAAG 2.0 Draft does not seem to have a success criteria to render the > invisible labels that were added to meet success criteria. > Is there a gap in the requirements between WCAG and UAAG that > disproportionately affect sighted users with cognitive disabilities? Phill, UAAG 2.0 does address this issue, although it does not explicitly state that it must be visual. The examples in the UAAG 2.0 reference are for a low vision user and for a user with a cognitive disability. https://www.w3.org/TR/UAAG20/#gl-info-link 1.10.1 Show Related Elements: The user can access the information from explicitly-defined relationships in the content, including at least the following: (Level AA) calculated accessible name for images calculated accessible name for controls (e.g. form fields, buttons) caption for a table row and column labels for a table cell FYI, UAAG 2.0 is no longer a draft, but is a completed Guideline published as a W3C Note. jeanne
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2016 15:26:49 UTC