- From: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:32:50 -0600
- To: "Durham, Heather" <heather.durham@pearson.com>
- Cc: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <201602262232.u1QMWseU009545@d01av02.pok.ibm.com>
well, the only reference to CSS in 1.3.1 that I found is an advisory technique to encourage actually using CSS correctly: [red underline highlighting added] Additional Techniques (Advisory) for 1.3.1 Although not required for conformance, the following additional techniques should be considered in order to make content more accessible. Not all techniques can be used or would be effective in all situations. C22: Using CSS to control visual presentation of text (CSS) Using CSS rather than tables for page layout (future link) nothing abut disabling CSS as a requirement that I could find. ___________ Regards, Phill Jenkins, From: "Durham, Heather" <heather.durham@pearson.com> To: Phill Jenkins/Austin/IBM@IBMUS Cc: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Date: 02/26/2016 04:25 PM Subject: Re: WCAG compliance question It is what I understood from this: WCAG 2.0 ? Level A - 1.3.1 Info and Relationships: Information, structure, and relationships conveyed through presentation can be programmatically determined or are available in text. (Level A) https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20120103/content-structure-separation-programmatic.html ?? On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Here's my take: With CSS disabled, users must be able to view, reach, activate and interact . . . Are you suggesting a new success criteria for WCAG 2.x? or is that your individual interpretation? Otherwise, where in WCAG 2.0 does it require the web app to work with CSS disabled? ___________ Regards, Phill Jenkins, -- Heather Durham Accessibility SQA, HEd Pearson 2154 E. Commons Ave. Suite 4000 Centennial, CO 80122 USA Learn more at pearson.com
Received on Friday, 26 February 2016 22:33:29 UTC