Sunday, 1 October 2000
Saturday, 30 September 2000
- Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken
- Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken
- Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken
- RE: Interesting Position Paper for DIW
- RE: Interesting Position Paper for DIW
- RE: Strawman Proposal: WCAG 2.0 Compliance
- Re: Strawman Proposal: WCAG 2.0 Compliance
- Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- Interesting Position Paper for DIW
- Strawman Proposal: WCAG 2.0 Compliance
- Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken
- Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken
Friday, 29 September 2000
- XML and XSLT Versions of Draft WCAG 2.0
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken
Saturday, 30 September 2000
Friday, 29 September 2000
- Re: Terminology Problem: "Avoid"
- Re: Terminology Problem: "Avoid"
- Terminology Problem: "Avoid"
- Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding*
- Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken
- Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding*
- usability testing
- Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding*
- Re: Alt="" or " "?
- Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding*
- Re: Alt="" or " "?
- Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding*
- HOT NEW BIOTECH COMPANY IN BARRONS THIS WEEK!!
Thursday, 28 September 2000
- WCAG 2 comments
- RE: Alt="" or " "?
- RE: Alt="" or " "?
- Why So Much Smart Money Is So High on Read-Rite !!
- Alt="" or " "?
- Re: 28 September 2000 telecon minutes
- Links to test pages
- correct URI: 28 September 2000 telecon minutes
- 28 September 2000 telecon minutes
- New draft, new change log, updated issues list
- HCI International 2001
- Re: my action item
- RE: my action item
- Re: Navigating an application
- Navigating an application
- Re: my action item
- Beyond the page - applications
- Re: Pelase review before UA telecon today
- Slogan?
- Pelase review before UA telecon today
- Re: Updated Home Page
- Updated Home Page
- RE: my action item
- Re: my action item
- RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding*
- Re: Agenda
- my action item
- Re: Agenda
Wednesday, 27 September 2000
- Agenda
- Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding*
- Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding*
- Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding*
- Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding*
- Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding*
- Re: Updated WCAG 1.0 Techniques published as Note
- Re: Action Item from 24 August
- Re: Flash and WCAG
- Re: Flash and WCAG
- Re: Flash and WCAG
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- Re: Flash and WCAG
- this might be of interest
- Porche Boxter or Luxury Cruise Earn $$$ In Days This Works!!!
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- Re: what does html 4 say about title and frames
- what does html 4 say about title and frames
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- AdvertExpress - the UK's largest advertising marketplace
- Actualidad empresarial (c553)
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Brain dump on advantages and disadvantages of different types of content
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
Tuesday, 26 September 2000
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: Brain dump on advantages and disadvantages of different types of content
- Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant
- RE: WCAG home page reorganization
- RE: Brain dump on advantages and disadvantages of different types of content
- RE: Brain dump on advantages and disadvantages of different types of content
- Re: Brain dump on advantages and disadvantages of different types of content
- RE: Brain dump on advantages and disadvantages of different types of content
- Brain dump on advantages and disadvantages of different types of content
Monday, 25 September 2000
- Re: side by side text
- Re: WCAG home page reorganization
- Re: Cut off for registration for F2F is Friday, 29 October.
- WCAG home page reorganization
- Re: Cut off for registration for F2F is Friday, 29 October.
- Re: Cut off for registration for F2F is Friday, 29 October.
- Cut off for registration for F2F is Friday, 29 October.
- Re: the title and name tags for frames (migration)
- Re: the title and name tags for frames (migration)
- Re: the title and name tags for frames (migration)
- Re: the title and name tags for frames
Saturday, 23 September 2000
Friday, 22 September 2000
Thursday, 21 September 2000
- Re: Agenda
- Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
- Re: Updated WCAG 1.0 Techniques published as Note
- Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
- So, How in the heck have you been?
- Re: author-defined content vs. "primary" content
- Re: Updated WCAG 1.0 Techniques published as Note
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
- Re: Agenda
- Re: Agenda
- Updated WCAG 1.0 Techniques published as Note
- Re: author-defined content vs. "primary" content
Wednesday, 20 September 2000
Tuesday, 19 September 2000
Wednesday, 20 September 2000
Tuesday, 19 September 2000
- Action Item from 24 August
- Re: Book Recommendation and User Testing Proposal
- Book Recommendation and User Testing Proposal
- the title and name tags for frames
- RE: Terminology revisited
- Re:%20interesting%20question%20on%20CD%20debate%20in%20WCAG%20working%20group&In
Monday, 18 September 2000
Sunday, 17 September 2000
Friday, 15 September 2000
- Proposed "plenary" W3C WG session
- RE: Terminology revisited
- Jason's latest draft
- Principles
- Re: Terminology revisited
- Re: Terminology revisited
- Re: Terminology revisited
- Re: Terminology revisited
- Re: Terminology revisited
- Re: Terminology revisited
- style stuff Re: Updated Techniques issues list
- Re: Terminology revisited
- Terminology revisited
Thursday, 14 September 2000
- Would like to join the WCAG Working Group
- Re: minutes from 14 sept. meeting
- charter scope
- minutes from 14 sept. meeting
- Flash and WCAG
- Re: Revised text of guidelines in response to action item
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
- we may have a new issue
- Re: clear & simple
- Re: clear & simple
- Re: clear & simple
- Re: a whole new headache?
- Re: Updated Techniques issues list
- Re: a whole new headache?
- Re: Fw: a whole new headache?
- Fw: a whole new headache?
- a whole new headache?
- Re: clear & simple
- Symbols and literacy, 2 Grants in the UK
- RE:Guide to the Guidelines
Wednesday, 13 September 2000
Thursday, 14 September 2000
Wednesday, 13 September 2000
- Re: "hidden" explanations
- Re: "hidden" explanations
- Further acknowledgments in relation to draft of guidelines
- Agenda
Tuesday, 12 September 2000
Wednesday, 13 September 2000
Tuesday, 12 September 2000
- Re: Guide to Guidelines
- Musicians Resources Europe
- "hidden" explanations
- Re: Revised text of guidelines in response to action item
- Re: Revised text of guidelines in response to action item
Monday, 11 September 2000
- Request to Join Web Content Guidelines Working Group
- RE: My Action Item VERY LATE sorry
- Re: Guide to Guidelines
- Regrets for Thursday, 14 September
- WAI in ten points? [was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>]
Tuesday, 12 September 2000
Monday, 11 September 2000
Tuesday, 12 September 2000
Monday, 11 September 2000
Tuesday, 12 September 2000
Monday, 11 September 2000
Tuesday, 12 September 2000
Monday, 11 September 2000
- Re: Guide to Guidelines
- Fw: Guide to Guidelines -Oops
- Re: Guide to Guidelines
- RE: My Action Item VERY LATE sorry
- Re: FW: My Action Item VERY LATE sorry
- FW: My Action Item VERY LATE sorry
Sunday, 10 September 2000
- RE: William
- Guide to Guidelines
- NETWORKING * COMPUTER REPAIR * INSTRUCTION * WEB PAGE DESIGN * STREAMING * CD ROM PRESENTATIONS * WE ARE YOUR ONE-STOP-SHOP LOCATED IN DOWNTOWN NYC!!!!
- Call for Papers: New international journal UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY
- easy to follow format
Saturday, 9 September 2000
Friday, 8 September 2000
- Helping Kids in the USA
- An Excerpt From the NBA Tape Recording Manual now online
- INPORTANT INFORMATION !!!! Increase your website's perfomance
- Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
Thursday, 7 September 2000
- Axes of debate: are they already defined in the requirements document??
- Minutes from 7 Sept. 2000 telecon
- Re: Principles
- RE: Principles
- Principles
- Re: "intro"
- Re: "intro"
- Re: "intro"
- Re: "intro"
- Forms [as of now] still a half-solved problem
- Re: "intro"
- Re: "intro"
- Re: article
- Re: "intro"
- Re: Agenda
- Re: "intro"
- Re: Agenda
- Re: Agenda
- Re: "intro"
- article
- Re: "intro"
- Re: "intro"
- Re: "intro"
- Re: Agenda
Wednesday, 6 September 2000
Tuesday, 5 September 2000
Monday, 4 September 2000
Sunday, 3 September 2000
Wednesday, 30 August 2000
Monday, 28 August 2000
- Suggestion for Technique document: LINK element and skipping links
- Re: Compliance matrix (Was: Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0)
Sunday, 27 August 2000
- Adobe prepares accessible PDF reader
- Re: Compliance matrix (Was: Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0)
- Re: Rewording for the masses
- Re: Compliance matrix (Was: Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0)
- Please Review: New WCAG 1.0 Techniques document
- Re: standard terms [was: Re: Trial A]
Saturday, 26 August 2000
- remarks
- Re: Compliance matrix (Was: Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0)
- standard terms [was: Re: Trial A]
- Re: Trial A
- Re: Trial A
Friday, 25 August 2000
- Trial A
- Rewording for the masses
- Please register: Registration for October F2F meetings now available
Thursday, 24 August 2000
- Minutes from 24 August 2000
- Regrets for Today (8/24)
- Re: Clarification of checkpoint 7.4 (also known as: calling all volunteers)
- notes for today's call
- Re: Clarification of checkpoint 7.4
- Compliance matrix (Was: Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0)
- Re: Clarification of checkpoint 7.4
- Re: Clarification of checkpoint 7.4
- Re: Clarification of checkpoint 7.4
- Donovan Hipke of MSN will start sitting in on calls
- RE: Making class more accessible
Wednesday, 23 August 2000
- walk the walk?
- Re: Making class more accessible
- Re: Making class more accessible
- Making class more accessible
- tech-specific checkpoints
- Please Review: Draft of technology-specific checkpoints
Tuesday, 22 August 2000
Monday, 21 August 2000
- Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3
- You win a free Portable H.F.(HK$190) for use of outdoor & driving car!
Saturday, 19 August 2000
Sunday, 20 August 2000
Saturday, 19 August 2000
- Re: Clarification of checkpoint 7.4
- Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0
- Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0
- Re: Clarification of checkpoint 7.4
- Re: Clarification of checkpoint 7.4
Friday, 18 August 2000
- Re: Clarification of checkpoint 7.4
- Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0
- Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0
- Clarification of checkpoint 7.4
- Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0
- Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0
- Organizing WCAG 2.0
- Re: Normative or informative?
- Normative or informative?
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
- Re: Comments on New (8/8) Techniques Working Draft
- Re: principles
Thursday, 17 August 2000
- Re: principles
- Re: principles
- Normative ?
- Minutes from 17 August 2000 telecon
- Comments on New (8/8) Techniques Working Draft
- Re: principles
- Re: literacy?
- regrets
- Re: DHTML menus and accessibility
- Re: principles
- Re: literacy?
- Re: literacy?
- Re: literacy?
- Re: principles
- literacy?
- Re: Comments and edits for the DRAFT WCAG 2.0
Wednesday, 16 August 2000
- Re: Comments and edits for the DRAFT WCAG 2.0
- Re: principles
- Re: recommended reading and 13 rules for accessible web design
- RE: Article: 13 rules for accessible Web pages
- principles
- FW: Article: 13 rules for accessible Web pages
- Re: Comments on 26 July 2000 WCAG 2.0 Draft
- recommended reading
- Re: Comments and edits for the DRAFT WCAG 2.0
- Draft Reformulation, p.s.
- Updated draft of Reformulation of WCAG
- Re: Principles of Web Accessibility
- Re: Principles of Web Accessibility
- Structure and organization of WCAG 2.0
- Re: Investigating terminology & structure with HTML examples
- Agenda
Tuesday, 15 August 2000
- Strata and Terminology: Proposed WD-WCAG20-20000726
- Strata and Terminology: WCAG 1.0 Techniques
- Strata and Terminology: WCAG 1.0
- Re: Investigating terminology & structure with HTML examples
- Re: Investigating terminology & structure with HTML examples
- Dicussion is generating open issues!
- Investigating terminology & structure with HTML examples
- Principles of Web Accessibility
- Re: Kynn's WCAG Proposal
- Re: Comments on 26 July 2000 WCAG 2.0 Draft
- Re: Kynn's WCAG Proposal
- Re: Kynn's WCAG Proposal
- Re: Kynn's WCAG Proposal
- comment on tech for WCAG 1.0 (Aug 8)
- Re: Kynn's WCAG Proposal
- Re: Kynn's WCAG Proposal
- Re: Comments on 26 July 2000 WCAG 2.0 Draft
- RE: Comments and edits for the DRAFT WCAG 2.0
- Kynn's WCAG Proposal
- Re: Terminology
- Re: Terminology
- Re: Terminology
- Re: Comments and edits for the DRAFT WCAG 2.0
- Re: Terminology
- Re: Comments on 26 July 2000 WCAG 2.0 Draft
- Re: Terminology
- Re: Terminology
- Terminology
Monday, 14 August 2000
- Re: Comments and edits for the DRAFT WCAG 2.0
- Re: Comments on 26 July 2000 WCAG 2.0 Draft
- Comments on 26 July 2000 WCAG 2.0 Draft
- Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3
- Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3
- Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3
- Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3
- Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3
- Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3
Saturday, 12 August 2000
Friday, 11 August 2000
- Request to Join
- Comments and edits for the DRAFT WCAG 2.0
- Re: Important?
- Re: Plain english with examples!
- Re: Plain english with examples!
Thursday, 10 August 2000
- Minutes from 10 August 2000 telecon
- Re: stylish semantics
- RE: Techniques for 2.2.3
- Important?
- RE: Techniques for 2.2.3
- Re: Information on support in speech synthesizers of language switching
- RE: Information on support in speech synthesizers of language switching
- Regrets (belated) for today's meeting.
- Information on support in speech synthesizers of language switching
- Plain english with examples!
- Re: use of hotspots and relative units
- Re: element to accessability mapping?
Wednesday, 9 August 2000
Tuesday, 8 August 2000
- Agenda
- Re: Draft Reformulation of WCAG 2.0 - published 26 July 2000
- Re: Draft Reformulation of WCAG 2.0 - published 26 July 2000
- Re: Draft Reformulation of WCAG 2.0 - published 26 July 2000
- Draft Reformulation of WCAG 2.0 - published 26 July 2000
- Re: stylish semantics
- Re: stylish semantics
- stylish semantics
- Face-to-face meetings 5/6 October in Bristol, England
- New Techniques Working Draft
Monday, 7 August 2000
Sunday, 6 August 2000
- Are you looking for a J.O.B. or Financial Freedom? osvdh
- Re: new version
- Re: CfP W3C Device Independent Authoring Workshop
- Re: CfP W3C Device Independent Authoring Workshop
Saturday, 5 August 2000
Friday, 4 August 2000
- Request to Join
- Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3
- Discussion and proposed wording for Errata for checkpoint 7.4
- Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3
- CfP W3C Device Independent Authoring Workshop
- Re: AU WG joining us for an afternoon at F2F in Bristol?
- Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3
- RE: Clarification Of Technique 1.3
Thursday, 3 August 2000
- RE: Clarification Of Technique 1.3
- Regrets for week of 8/7
- Merged Glossaries (2) from WCAG, AU, and UA
- Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3
- Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3
- Re: AU WG joining us for an afternoon at F2F in Bristol?
- Re: AU WG joining us for an afternoon at F2F in Bristol?
- Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3
Wednesday, 2 August 2000
Tuesday, 1 August 2000
- Meeting postponed
- Re: AU WG joining us for an afternoon at F2F in Bristol?
- AU WG joining us for an afternoon at F2F in Bristol?
- Merged Glossaries from WCAG, AU, and UA (2000-07-07)
- Internationalization guidelines
- Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3
Monday, 31 July 2000
- eLearn to Design Information
- eLearn to Design Information
- Internet Based Teaching - August 15, 2000
- Business Proposal
Sunday, 30 July 2000
- toner cartridges
- Do You want to earn $3000 or more per month?! Vi hotite zarabativat $3000 i bolee v mesjac?!
Saturday, 29 July 2000
Friday, 28 July 2000
- Latest draft of principles and guidelines
- Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3
- Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3
- Request for review to IG
- Clarification Of Technique 1.3
- Request to join
Thursday, 27 July 2000
- Minutes from 27 July 2000 telecon
- Please review: Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0
- Re: minimal/tersified abstract generalized principles
- Re: minimal/tersified abstract generalized principles
- Re: new version
- Re: Agenda
- Re: Agenda
- minimal/tersified abstract generalized principles
Wednesday, 26 July 2000
Tuesday, 25 July 2000
- Re: Face2face October 5/6 in Bristol?
- Re: Face2face October 5/6 in Bristol?
- Face2face October 5/6 in Bristol?
Monday, 24 July 2000
Saturday, 22 July 2000
Friday, 21 July 2000
- Tuition-Free Computer and IT Training for Non-Profit Employees
- RE: Status of RTF format?
- RE: Status of RTF format?
- popup question
- RE: Status of RTF format?
- RE: Status of RTF format?
- Re: Status of RTF format?
- Re: Status of RTF format?
- Re: Minutes from 20 july WCAG telecon
- Minutes from 20 july WCAG telecon
Thursday, 20 July 2000
- Re: principles
- principles
- mirroring problems
- RE: Status of RTF format?
- Re: Status of RTF format?
- Re: new techniques draft, ready to send to IG?
- Re: Status of RTF format?
- regrets for today's call
- RE: Status of RTF format?
- Re: Status of RTF format?
- Re: Status of RTF format?
- RE: Status of RTF format?
- Re: Status of RTF format?
- Re: Status of RTF format?
- Status of RTF format?
- Re: new techniques draft, ready to send to IG?
- Re: new techniques draft, ready to send to IG?
- new techniques draft, ready to send to IG?
Wednesday, 19 July 2000
Tuesday, 18 July 2000
- Re: "Sensory modality" in English
- use of tabindex [was: Re: Proposal for Technique 13.6.1 Grouping links]
Monday, 17 July 2000
Friday, 7 July 2000
Monday, 17 July 2000
- Re: Proposal for Technique 13.6.1 Grouping links
- Re: What is a text? (was Re: Back to Principle 1)
- Re: What is a text? (was Re: Back to Principle 1)
- Re: What is a text? (was Re: Back to Principle 1)
- Re: Back to Principle 1
- What is a text? (was Re: Back to Principle 1)
- Re: Back to Principle 1
- Re: Back to Principle 1
- Re: Back to Principle 1
Sunday, 16 July 2000
- Re: Back to Principle 1
- "Sensory modality" in English
- Re: Back to Principle 1
- Back to Principle 1
- Restatement of Principle 2
Friday, 14 July 2000
- Book announcement
- 6th ERCIM Workshop on "USER INTERFACES FOR ALL"
- Coverage of cognitive considerations in new guidelines draft
- Re: New guidelines draft
- Re: New guidelines draft
- RE: New guidelines draft
Thursday, 13 July 2000
- Re: New guidelines draft
- Re: Critiques of Techniques
- Jason's draft posted to WAI GL site as HTML document
- minutes from 13 july telecon
- Action Item: Investigate portals for PDA support
- Re: New guidelines draft
- Re: New guidelines draft
- Re: New guidelines draft
- RE: New guidelines draft
- RE: Penn State Accessibility Website - a model for future work?
- Re: The principal principles
- Re: The principal principles
- The principal principles
- New guidelines draft
Wednesday, 12 July 2000
- "Information Design" Alert for Info Professionals
- Re: generalization/abstraction
- RE: Penn State Accessibility Website - a model for future work?
- Re: Penn State Accessibility Website - a model for future work?
- Penn State Accessibility Website - a model for future work?
- Action items from previous meetings
- Agenda
Tuesday, 11 July 2000
Monday, 10 July 2000
Sunday, 9 July 2000
Saturday, 8 July 2000
Friday, 7 July 2000
- Author's evaluation and Color-blind questionnaire page
- Device Independent Workshops
- Specifiying font sizes with FONT, an accessibility issue?
- Dynamically Generated Pages (taking it to a wider audience)
Thursday, 6 July 2000
- Generalized checkpoints and technology-specific checkpoints
- minutes from 6 july telecon
- Updated requirements doc
- Isn't X-Link where the Fat Links infrastructure belongs?
- Fwd: Summary of the User Survey: Browsers and Scripting
- Re: User Survey: accesskey
- Re: User Survey: accesskey