- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 22:06:48 -0700
- To: jimallan@tsbvi.edu, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Cc: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
I incorporated these suggestions although the alt may seem cryptic but it now gives better destination clues. At 11:24 AM 9/11/00 -0500, Jim Allan wrote: >Looks Good William, >I like your choice of graphics. I would add a space between the graphics and >the text, to me it looks a little crowded. I like the additional commentary >provided by the alt text. But, I could not tell from the alt text where the >link would take me; when I looked at the status line, the url clued me in. >Maybe commentary, with link destination information. On the animation with >the arrow road sign the alt says "this way to the guidelines" but the link >takes you to the checklist. > >Jim Allan, Statewide Technical Support Specialist >Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired >1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756 >voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9453 http://www.tsbvi.edu/ >"Be BOLD and mighty forces will come to your aid." Basil King > >-----Original Message----- >From: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org]On >Behalf Of William Loughborough >Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 1:25 PM >To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org >Cc: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org >Subject: Guide to Guidelines > > >A funny thing happened on my way to the Website. I decided to put in some >graphics because Jonathan thought it might help and others said it would >look better. I always thought that was just short of nonsensical. So I put >in some (supposedly appropriate) icon-like graphics and *ta-da* it not only >looked different, it sort of looked better. Then I thought they'd probably >be more useful if they were links. So I made them go places. > >Now the "Guideline Guide" has over 20 links. Although many of them are to >the WCAG 1.0 and other WAI documents, several are to outside sources I've >found useful in this area. I could use lots more - it's kind of nice to >have resources pre-located and all in one place IMHO. I'd like some >feedback from some on the lists who try the site at >http://rdf.pair.com/guide.htm with the idea that it can be sort of like a >"concordance" for WCAG. > > >-- >Love. > ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Monday, 11 September 2000 13:07:15 UTC