RE: Guide to Guidelines

I incorporated these suggestions although the alt may seem cryptic but it 
now gives better destination clues.

At 11:24 AM 9/11/00 -0500, Jim Allan wrote:
>Looks Good William,
>I like your choice of graphics. I would add a space between the graphics and
>the text, to me it looks a little crowded. I like the additional commentary
>provided by the alt text. But, I could not tell from the alt text where the
>link would take me; when I looked at the status line, the url clued me in.
>Maybe commentary, with link destination information. On the animation with
>the arrow road sign the alt says "this way to the guidelines" but the link
>takes you to the checklist.
>
>Jim Allan, Statewide Technical Support Specialist
>Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
>1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
>voice 512.206.9315    fax: 512.206.9453  http://www.tsbvi.edu/
>"Be BOLD and mighty forces will come to your aid." Basil King
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org]On
>Behalf Of William Loughborough
>Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 1:25 PM
>To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
>Cc: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
>Subject: Guide to Guidelines
>
>
>A funny thing happened on my way to the Website. I decided to put in some
>graphics because Jonathan thought it might help and others said it would
>look better. I always thought that was just short of nonsensical. So I put
>in some (supposedly appropriate) icon-like graphics and *ta-da* it not only
>looked different, it sort of looked better. Then I thought they'd probably
>be more useful if they were links. So I made them go places.
>
>Now the "Guideline Guide" has over 20 links. Although many of them are to
>the WCAG 1.0 and other WAI documents, several are to outside sources I've
>found useful in this area. I could use lots more - it's kind of nice to
>have resources pre-located and all in one place IMHO. I'd like some
>feedback from some on the lists who try the site at
>http://rdf.pair.com/guide.htm with the idea that it can be sort of like a
>"concordance" for WCAG.
>
>
>--
>Love.
>                  ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE


--
Love.
                 ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE

Received on Monday, 11 September 2000 13:07:15 UTC