- From: Bruce Bailey <bbailey@clark.net>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 11:11:03 -0400
- To: "Greg Gay" <g.gay@utoronto.ca>, <love26@gorge.net>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> My question is, if a developer includes RTF copies of word processed > documents on a web site, are they obliged to include an html version in > order to satisfy guideline 11.1? Yes, absolutely. RTF is only modestly more accessible than PDF (or Word or WordPerfect for that matter). Sure, its a shared non-proprietary format, but there are no public specifications for "validity", let alone "accessible". Besides, all of those formats are presentation oriented -- as opposed to HTML which was MEANT to share information (and is being ABUSED when used for GUI formatting effects).
Received on Thursday, 20 July 2000 11:12:12 UTC