- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 22:34:48 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
- cc: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I had a look through the checklist for WCAG 1 - http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/full-checklist - to see how technology specific the checkpoints were. There are 16 priority 1 checkpoints. On my first read, I thought that 6.1 and 12.1 are technology specific. 5.1 and 5.2 are about labelling tables - really special cases of a general requirement, but not actually technology specific in the same sense. At a stretch I could see an argument that 1.2 and 9.1 (dealing with image maps) are technology specific, but I don't buy the argument. Leaving at least 10 of 16 checkpoints, by my reckoning, as technology-independent yet verifiable. I thought that as I got into the priority 2 checkpoints it would change drastically. It changed, but not drastically. I think that the problem to be solved is about working out what is a special case, that got elevated to checkpoint or guidelines level because we were thinking about HTML, and what is a general requirement for accessibility. Shifting a few of our current checkpoints to techniques for meeting slightly more generally expressed checkpoints would already give us a good basis document (the WCAG 2.0 draft doesn't lose functionality from WCAG 1, and we haven't considered any substantive change in our requirements yet.) Charles On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Jason White wrote: What I am arguing is that the meanings have already shifted and that we need to make the best of the new situation. Checkpoints used to be (in WCAG 1.0) largely, but not entirely technology-specific; the Techniques were merely explanations and examples of the checkpoints in many, though not all, cases. Recent discourse within the working group has reflected the ambiguity by referring to "technology-specific" checkpoints". We need to clarify the terminology, either by using "checkpoint" to mean a technology-specific requirement, or a general strategy of accessible design which, though not at the most abstract level, is stated at a level of specificity that allows concrete implementation strategies to follow from it. -- -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053 Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001, Australia
Received on Monday, 14 August 2000 22:34:57 UTC