- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 08:30:22 -0400 (EDT)
- To: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- cc: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I think those are what we have called guidelines in WCAG 1.0 (I think that the checkpoints should express requirements, for things like "ensure text equivalents are available for evrything", or "ensure that structure is reflected in presentations supplied". Those things are checkable, although it is helpful to have specific technique information for a specific language... chaals On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, William Loughborough wrote: At 08:22 AM 9/15/00 -0400, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >I agree that we need a layer of examples, WL: How about a layer of "principles" - with or without numbers? -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia September - November 2000: W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Friday, 15 September 2000 08:30:28 UTC