- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 10:38:35 -0400
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Ian, Good comments! >Part 1) I don't think it's a good idea to redefine the terms > Guidelines and Checkpoints. I think doing so will create confusion > and I don't understand why it's necessary. agreed. however, i did not make changes to terminology in this draft. This issue is a documented open issue. Part 2 - responsibility. Good comments. I added a couple sentences to the current draft, but primarily will document this as an open issue. >Part 3) Organizing principles. While I'm at it, here's how I might > break down the requirements (without indicating here which > responsibilities are for authors, user agent developers, and > users. <snip> This is really interesting, but I wasn't sure how to use it in this draft. Perhaps this would be used in the introduction? In supplementary material? I'm not sure, but it is interesting to group the ideas this way. Perhaps these are actually the 3 main themes or principles and everything falls under them. Not sure. Thanks, --wendy -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative madison, wi usa tel: +1 608 663 6346 /--
Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2000 10:36:22 UTC