- From: seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 08:15:43 +0200
- To: "wia" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Oops - spell checker did not kick in. For anyone who cannot read my misspellings, hear it comes again. Sorry..... -----Original Message----- From: seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il> To: wia <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Date: Monday, September 11, 2000 8:11 AM Subject: Re: Guide to Guidelines >Fantastic. >I think one thing is missing and that is an short introduction that will >make the Guide to Guidelines make sense the first time around. - I.E. Not >everyone is using the same input and output mediums, people can have trouble >navigating, not everyone will be seeing the format, so convey structure >information though markup. > >Alternatively, an explanatory sentence by each principal, would serve the same >end. Otherwise people can be left asking "why?". But it is looking good Lisa > >>A funny thing happened on my way to the Website. I decided to put in some >>graphics because Jonathan thought it might help and others said it would >>look better. I always thought that was just short of nonsensical. So I put >>in some (supposedly appropriate) icon-like graphics and *ta-da* it not only >>looked different, it sort of looked better. Then I thought they'd probably >>be more useful if they were links. So I made them go places. >> >>Now the "Guideline Guide" has over 20 links. Although many of them are to >>the WCAG 1.0 and other WAI documents, several are to outside sources I've >>found useful in this area. I could use lots more - it's kind of nice to >>have resources pre-located and all in one place IMHO. I'd like some >>feedback from some on the lists who try the site at >>http://rdf.pair.com/guide.htm with the idea that it can be sort of like a >>"concordance" for WCAG. >> >> >>-- >>Love. >> ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE >> >> >
Received on Monday, 11 September 2000 01:18:19 UTC