- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 07:42:31 -0700
- To: seeman@netvision.net.il, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 09:12 AM 9/21/00 +0000, lisa kestenbaum wrote: >review the text with these considerations in mind prior to publication on >the web. WL: Perhaps a full stop after "mind"? No matter how old I get, I still have a hard time becoming oriented to "orientate". It's the same kind of "bloviation" as we find when what commentators do isn't to comment (as it was in my youth <g>), but to "commentate". LK:: Insinuations and trends that are intended to be identified by analyzing the structure, should be explicitly stated in the summary. WL: In a search for excellence occasional nuggets occur and this should IMO be topmore (How's that for a corruption of "topmost"?). LK::" [from 3.5]"...provide abbreviated labels..." [from 3.10]"...provide expansions for abbreviations and acronyms..." WL: These (and there may be others) might benefit from "gathering"? LK:: 3.11 "...This can be improved by: a) Restricting these items to one section of the page can help the user retain focus. b) For a content filled site, one may further provide the user with an option view without banners..." WL: some grammar change ("can" to "to" in a and for b "For a content-filled site, providing an optional banner-free view")? LK:: "4, Design for ease browsing and navigation" WL: Either "ease of" or "easy"? LK:: "To help the User's navigate: [The old "gratuitous apostrohe"?] a) They should be easy to locate within the over-all structure of the content. b) They should be consistent across web pages or related documents? WL: I'm confused about to whom "they" refer - surely we don't need to locate consistent users across Web pages <g>. LK:: "...examples of this includes..." and "...all links have a textual equivalents...." WL: Number, please? In summary I think this is really good stuff or I wouldn't be making these picky little proofreads. I vote for incorporation! -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2000 10:44:16 UTC