- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 11:18:05 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Greg Gay <g.gay@utoronto.ca>
- cc: love26@gorge.net, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
In order to comply with WCAG there need to be various things included, like text alternatives for non-text objects, markup to specify the language of things, that they are abbreviations, a seperation of presentation information from content, and so on. Some of these things can be achieved in RTF, some I don't believe can, and in some cases there is a huge gulf between can and routinely are. I don't know that there is a consensus in the group (unless everyone agrees with me <grin/>) - what would you suggest it should be? Charles McCN On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Greg Gay wrote: My question is, if a developer includes rtf copies of word processed documents on a web site, are they obliged to include an html version in order to satisfy guideline 11.1?
Received on Thursday, 20 July 2000 11:20:09 UTC