- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 15:26:20 -0700
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Okay, let's start by examining what exists. Here's what we
currently have in WCAG 1.0:
Themes -- very very broad (only 2 in WCAG 1.0)
Guideline Summary
Guideline Full Text
Guideline Rationale/Explanation
Checkpoints
Techniques Reference
Note that techniques are not actually organized by checkpoint
internally in the Techniques document; thus the use of
"reference" above.
Here's an XML representation of the WCAG document
<wcag>
<themes>
<theme>...</theme>
<theme>...</theme>
</themes>
<guidelines>
<guideline>
<summary>...</summary>
<full text>...</sumary>
<rationale>
<para>...</para>
<para>...</para>
</rationale>
<checkpoints>
<checkpoint priority="1" technique="wcag_tech#id">
...
</checkpoint>
<checkpoint priority="3" technique="wcag_tech#id">
...
</checkpoint>
<checkpoint priority="2" technique="wcag_tech#id">
...
</checkpoint>
</checkpoints>
</guideline>
<guideline>
...
</guideline>
</guidelines>
</wcag>
Does this look accurate to everyone? (In other words, have I
correctly identified the structure of the WCAG 1.0 document?)
--
Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com/
Director of Accessibility, Edapta http://www.edapta.com/
Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://www.idyllmtn.com/
AWARE Center Director http://www.awarecenter.org/
Vote for Liz for N. Am. ICANN Nominee! http://www.khyri.com/icann/
Received on Tuesday, 15 August 2000 18:36:55 UTC