Re: Status of RTF format?

GG:: "...need to provide a W3C format (html) for documents available for
download in rtf format"

WL: Somehow "available for download" doesn't sound like Web stuff per
se. If a file is "downloadable" it might be in ASCII and be accessible
and not "require" conversion into HTML? As to rtf (I think that means
"rich text file"?) I would suspect the same. 

As I understand the guideline Greg brings up it has to do with stuff
posted to the Web rather than items downloadable via the internet?

-- 
Love.
            ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
http://dicomp.pair.com

Received on Thursday, 20 July 2000 09:49:47 UTC