- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 22:06:24 -0500
- To: "'Charles McCathieNevile'" <charles@w3.org>, "'William Loughborough'" <love26@gorge.net>
- Cc: <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "'GL - WAI Guidelines WG (E-mail)'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
My point is just that complex language should never be used where more
straightforward language can be found.
(we even have a guidelines that says that!)
I will also balance that with my favorite quote from Albert
"Everything should be made as simple as possible.. but no simpler"
A Einstein
So lets strive to make things as simple as possible. Not degrading them.
But making them more elegant. More piquant. More concise. More
understandable. Wherever we can.
Gregg
-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Charles McCathieNevile
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 9:14 PM
To: William Loughborough
Cc: gv@trace.wisc.edu; GL - WAI Guidelines WG (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Comments and edits for the DRAFT WCAG 2.0
I have no problem with the principles being academic, but I think we should
try to express them in language that is a bit closer to what people speak.
Charles
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, William Loughborough wrote:
GV:: "my first point is that many of our principles are way too
academic."
WL: I had hoped that would be the idea. They will almost always be in
the context of having Guidelines and Checkpoints associated with them
but they furnish a "lofty" view of what we're about. I seem to remember
the words "abstract" and "general" - which almost demands "academic".
I have no quarrel with all the rest of the (mostly
editorial/wordsmithing issues) comments in Gregg's post. But please
let's let the prinicples be Principles. They can say it in general
enough terms (and abstractly enough) that they might even resound. I
believe their brevity (and IMO clarity) trumps any complaints about
"academic" leading to a turn-off. The casual reader (whatever that is in
this case!) only has to look down one more line and be in a "real world"
description of the "how" and even a bit of "what".
--
--
Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134
136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053
Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001, Australia
Received on Monday, 14 August 2000 23:06:18 UTC