- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 11:40:19 -0400
- To: love26@gorge.net (William Loughborough), w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, cynthia_shelly@hotmail.com, Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>, rneff@zalecorp.com, ryladog@earthlink.net, kshea@apollo.fedworld.gov
William, I think this is a good start. It's short and clear. I have not compared it with other drafts to make sure that everything is there nor have i thoroughly tested to make sure that it is not ambiguous. We ought to take a couple drafts and pass them by folks who will be implementing this stuff and keep track of their questions and comments. "Usability testing" of our drafts to find out what works and what does not. This was discussed briefly at yesterday's meeting and has been part of the requirements for the next draft for some time. We have verbal agreements from a couple usability testing places to periodically test drafts for ease of reading, comprehensibility, ease of use, etc. As a first pass on this... Kynn, Cynthia, Rob, Dick, Katie, others, You seem to be in the most contact with folks who are trying to implement the guidelines. Do you think it would be helpful to ask a few of those folks to review and compare William's latest draft [1], the latest reformulation [2], and the WCAG 1.0 checklist [3]? Then report back to the list their comments and questions? --wendy At 07:20 AM 9/8/00 , William Loughborough wrote: >The "guide to the guidelines" is now replete with links to various >documents. Please comment. It's at http://rdf.pair.com/guide.htm > > >-- >Love. > ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative madison, wi usa tel: +1 608 663 6346 /--
Received on Friday, 8 September 2000 11:37:41 UTC