- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 11:55:43 +1100 (EST)
- To: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
In the draft which was circulated under my name over the weekend, I tried to take into account contributions by a variety of working group participants. These include: 1. Kynn's concerns as to the presence of vague, imprecise or unqualified statements in the exposition of general guidelines. 2. Cynthia's concern that guidelines should be as precise as possible in specifying requirements, and that they be applicable to future as well as current technologies, including, in particular, server-side solutions. Also, the distinction between "web content" and "applications" is partly addressed, for example in the note accompanying Principle 4. 3. Dick's reminder that structured data bases and metadata do not carry their own (author-supplied) presentations has been taken into account (note accompanying guideline 3). 4. The issue, raised by Loretta, of character encodings and the role of standard character sets as a requirement for accessibility, influenced the reformulation of guideline 1.1. 5. William's desire for clear and general principles as the basis of the more concrete guidelines, has influenced the reformulation of principles 1 and 5. 6. Andi's discussion of the circumstances in which synchronized text equivalents and auditory descriptions are required (see her reformulation of the guidelines under Principle 1) led to the discussion attachedto guideline 1.2. 7. The discussion surrounding the meaning of "graceful transformation" led to its removal from the document in this draft. 8. The desire for greater clarity and simplicity led to the removal of unnecessary terminology (such as "default presentations", "author-supplied presentations" etc.). Please review the draft to determine whether, and if so how well, your concerns have been met, what further changes could be made, etc.
Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2000 20:57:54 UTC