- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 06:24:57 -0700
- To: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
JW:: "Providing the practicing web site designer with guidance is only one of the purposes of the document." WL: Kynn must remember this just as I must remember that this is one of the purposes <g>. JW:: "The guidelines themselves cannot be changed without proceeding through the W3C process. They are supposed to be (and must comprise) a stable document, subject to change only infrequently." WL: Kynn's idea that there should be new accessibility examples for every new technology does not fly in the face of this problem. If the strata are from most to least general then the top two or so "normative" parts need only infrequent change and the tagged-on parts needed when all the acronyms come out to play will be created on demand - based on the upper, abstract levels. We've got to start somewhere and I hope/pray that it is with the abstract statements currently called "principles", which though probably not perpetually immutable, can be comprehensive and *normative* (whatever that means<g>). -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE http://dicomp.pair.com
Received on Tuesday, 15 August 2000 09:28:17 UTC