w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from July to September 2000 by author

4AmI5fjnp@dui.sapienza.it

• Non-profit help for homeowners (Saturday, 8 July)

a1@NOWHERE.com

• surplus upto 80% off DEC WYSE hp IBM 3com nic $9 (Friday, 3 January)

akl@aol.com

• smithy tools (Sunday, 3 September)
• smithy tools (Sunday, 3 September)

Al Gilman

• Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: the title and name tags for frames (migration) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: author-defined content vs. "primary" content (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: a whole new headache? (Thursday, 14 September)
• Forms [as of now] still a half-solved problem (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: "intro" (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: "intro" (Thursday, 7 September)
• standard terms [was: Re: Trial A] (Saturday, 26 August)
• Re: Clarification of checkpoint 7.4 (Thursday, 24 August)
• Re: Clarification of checkpoint 7.4 (Saturday, 19 August)
• Re: principles (Friday, 18 August)
• Re: principles (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Friday, 28 July)
• Re: popup question (Saturday, 22 July)
• Re: Back to Principle 1 (Monday, 17 July)
• "Sensory modality" in English (Sunday, 16 July)
• Re: Back to Principle 1 (Sunday, 16 July)
• Isn't X-Link where the Fat Links infrastructure belongs? (Thursday, 6 July)
• Re: User Survey: accesskey (Thursday, 6 July)

Alan J. Flavell

• Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding* (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: Alt="" or " "? (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding* (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: Guide to Guidelines (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: Guide to Guidelines (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: stylish semantics (Tuesday, 8 August)
• RE: Status of RTF format? (Friday, 21 July)
• RE: Status of RTF format? (Friday, 21 July)

Andi Snow-Weaver

• Re: my action item (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: my action item (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: "intro" (Thursday, 7 September)

Andi Snow-Weaver/Austin/IBM

• Minutes from 21 Sept. 2000 telecon (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: Revised text of guidelines in response to action item (Thursday, 14 September)
• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Thursday, 14 September)

andisnow@us.ibm.com

• Rewording for the masses (Friday, 25 August)
• Re: Face2face October 5/6 in Bristol? (Tuesday, 25 July)
• Re: new techniques draft, ready to send to IG? (Thursday, 20 July)
• Re: Critiques of Techniques (Thursday, 13 July)

Anne Pemberton

• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding* (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding* (Friday, 29 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Wednesday, 27 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Wednesday, 27 September)
• RE: Terminology revisited (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: Guide to Guidelines (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: principles (Thursday, 17 August)

aol@020.co.uk

• New millenium (Monday, 3 July)
• New millenium (Sunday, 2 July)

Bailey, Bruce

• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Wednesday, 27 September)
• RE: Article: 13 rules for accessible Web pages (Wednesday, 16 August)

bench1@lakmail.com

• toner cartridges (Sunday, 30 July)

bmaxpen232332@yahoo.com

• READRITE FORMS FIBER OPTICS COMPANY!!!!!!! (Monday, 18 September)

Bradleymri@aol.com

• Re:%20interesting%20question%20on%20CD%20debate%20in%20WCAG%20working%20group&In (Tuesday, 19 September)

Bruce Bailey

• Re: Status of RTF format? (Monday, 24 July)
• RE: Status of RTF format? (Friday, 21 July)
• RE: Status of RTF format? (Friday, 21 July)
• RE: Status of RTF format? (Thursday, 20 July)
• RE: Status of RTF format? (Thursday, 20 July)

by way of Harvey Bingham

• Merged Glossaries from WCAG, AU, and UA (2000-07-07) (Tuesday, 1 August)

callback123@altavistausa.com

• Re: From Lorraine,as promised,I can lower your bill (Saturday, 29 July)

Cary Maxwell

• FREE GAMES (Monday, 4 September)

Charles McCathieNevile

• RE: my action item (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: Navigating an application (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: Pelase review before UA telecon today (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: Flash and WCAG (Wednesday, 27 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Wednesday, 27 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: what does html 4 say about title and frames (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• RE: Brain dump on advantages and disadvantages of different types of content (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: side by side text (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: WCAG home page reorganization (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: the title and name tags for frames (migration) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: the title and name tags for frames (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: author-defined content vs. "primary" content (Thursday, 21 September)
• RE: Terminology revisited (Sunday, 17 September)
• Re: Terminology revisited (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: Terminology revisited (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: Terminology revisited (Friday, 15 September)
• style stuff Re: Updated Techniques issues list (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: Terminology revisited (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: clear & simple (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: Updated Techniques issues list (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: Fw: a whole new headache? (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: clear & simple (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: "hidden" explanations (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: Compliance matrix (Was: Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0) (Monday, 28 August)
• Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0 (Sunday, 20 August)
• regrets (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: Terminology (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: Comments and edits for the DRAFT WCAG 2.0 (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: Terminology (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: Comments on 26 July 2000 WCAG 2.0 Draft (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: Terminology (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Monday, 14 August)
• RE: Techniques for 2.2.3 (Thursday, 10 August)
• Re: Draft Reformulation of WCAG 2.0 - published 26 July 2000 (Tuesday, 8 August)
• Re: Draft Reformulation of WCAG 2.0 - published 26 July 2000 (Tuesday, 8 August)
• Re: stylish semantics (Tuesday, 8 August)
• Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Monday, 7 August)
• Re: new version (Sunday, 6 August)
• Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Friday, 4 August)
• RE: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Friday, 4 August)
• Re: AU WG joining us for an afternoon at F2F in Bristol? (Thursday, 3 August)
• Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Thursday, 3 August)
• Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Tuesday, 1 August)
• RE: Status of RTF format? (Monday, 24 July)
• Re: Status of RTF format? (Friday, 21 July)
• Re: Minutes from 20 july WCAG telecon (Friday, 21 July)
• RE: Status of RTF format? (Thursday, 20 July)
• Re: Status of RTF format? (Thursday, 20 July)
• Re: new techniques draft, ready to send to IG? (Thursday, 20 July)
• Re: "Sensory modality" in English (Tuesday, 18 July)
• Re: Authoring Tool Accessibility (fwd) (Monday, 17 July)
• Re: What is a text? (was Re: Back to Principle 1) (Monday, 17 July)
• Re: What is a text? (was Re: Back to Principle 1) (Monday, 17 July)
• Re: Back to Principle 1 (Monday, 17 July)
• Re: Back to Principle 1 (Monday, 17 July)
• Re: New guidelines draft (Thursday, 13 July)
• Re: The principal principles (Thursday, 13 July)

Chris Ridpath

• Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Monday, 21 August)
• Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Wednesday, 2 August)
• Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Friday, 28 July)
• Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Friday, 28 July)

Claus Thøgersen

• what does html 4 say about title and frames (Wednesday, 27 September)
• the title and name tags for frames (Tuesday, 19 September)

Constantine Stephanidis

• Call for Papers: New international journal UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY (Sunday, 10 September)
• Book announcement (Friday, 14 July)
• 6th ERCIM Workshop on "USER INTERFACES FOR ALL" (Friday, 14 July)

Cynthia Shelly

• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Friday, 29 September)
• RE: Alt="" or " "? (Thursday, 28 September)
• RE: Terminology revisited (Friday, 15 September)
• regrets for thursday's call (Monday, 11 September)
• Comments on New (8/8) Techniques Working Draft (Thursday, 17 August)
• RE: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Thursday, 3 August)
• Request to join (Friday, 28 July)
• Dynamically Generated Pages (taking it to a wider audience) (Friday, 7 July)

Daniel Dardailler

• CfP W3C Device Independent Authoring Workshop (Friday, 4 August)
• Device Independent Workshops (Friday, 7 July)

David Poehlman

• Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Saturday, 30 September)

dgyi@bigfoot.com

• INPORTANT INFORMATION !!!! Increase your website's perfomance (Friday, 8 September)

Dick Brown

• Donovan Hipke of MSN will start sitting in on calls (Thursday, 24 August)
• Regrets for week of 8/7 (Thursday, 3 August)
• Minutes from 20 july WCAG telecon (Friday, 21 July)

donald453@bbc.co.uk

• Porche Boxter or Luxury Cruise Earn $$$ In Days This Works!!! (Wednesday, 27 September)

Donovan Hipke

• Would like to join the WCAG Working Group (Thursday, 14 September)

dvdoioi@bg.mbn.or.jp

• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Friday, 8 September)

eSocrates eCenter Mailing List

• eLearn to Design Information (Monday, 31 July)
• eLearn to Design Information (Monday, 31 July)
• Internet Based Teaching - August 15, 2000 (Monday, 31 July)
• "Information Design" Alert for Info Professionals (Wednesday, 12 July)

Gavriel Salvendy

• HCI International 2001 (Thursday, 28 September)

geoff freed

• Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Monday, 14 August)

Greg Gay

• Re: Flash and WCAG (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: Status of RTF format? (Friday, 21 July)
• Re: Status of RTF format? (Thursday, 20 July)
• Re: Status of RTF format? (Thursday, 20 July)
• Re: Status of RTF format? (Thursday, 20 July)
• Status of RTF format? (Thursday, 20 July)

Gregg Vanderheiden

• RE: Interesting Position Paper for DIW (Saturday, 30 September)
• RE: Interesting Position Paper for DIW (Saturday, 30 September)
• RE: Strawman Proposal: WCAG 2.0 Compliance (Saturday, 30 September)
• RE: Terminology revisited (Tuesday, 19 September)
• FW: Article: 13 rules for accessible Web pages (Wednesday, 16 August)
• RE: Comments and edits for the DRAFT WCAG 2.0 (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Comments and edits for the DRAFT WCAG 2.0 (Friday, 11 August)

Gregory J. Rosmaita

• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken (Saturday, 30 September)
• author-defined content vs. "primary" content (Tuesday, 19 September)

Harvey Bingham

• Merged Glossaries (2) from WCAG, AU, and UA (Thursday, 3 August)

HotStock@masterone.com

• HOT NEW BIOTECH COMPANY IN BARRONS THIS WEEK!! (Friday, 29 September)

HotStocks@aba.com

• Why So Much Smart Money Is So High on Read-Rite !! (Thursday, 28 September)

Ian Jacobs

• Brain dump on advantages and disadvantages of different types of content (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: Trial A (Saturday, 26 August)
• Re: Clarification of checkpoint 7.4 (Saturday, 19 August)
• Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0 (Friday, 18 August)
• Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0 (Friday, 18 August)
• Organizing WCAG 2.0 (Friday, 18 August)
• Re: literacy? (Thursday, 17 August)
• Comments on 26 July 2000 WCAG 2.0 Draft (Monday, 14 August)
• Information on support in speech synthesizers of language switching (Thursday, 10 August)

Indian Agribusiness Systems Ltd

• Business Proposal (Monday, 31 July)

James Park

• See-through digital camera (Wednesday, 19 July)

Jason Hinkin

• RE: My Action Item VERY LATE sorry (Monday, 11 September)

Jason White

• Agenda (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 21 September)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Terminology revisited (Friday, 15 September)
• Further acknowledgments in relation to draft of guidelines (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: Revised text of guidelines in response to action item (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Revised text of guidelines in response to action item (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: "intro" (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: "intro" (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 7 September)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Agenda (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0 (Sunday, 20 August)
• Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0 (Saturday, 19 August)
• Re: literacy? (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: principles (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: Comments and edits for the DRAFT WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 17 August)
• Structure and organization of WCAG 2.0 (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: Kynn's WCAG Proposal (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: Terminology (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Terminology (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Agenda (Tuesday, 8 August)
• Meeting postponed (Tuesday, 1 August)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 26 July)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 19 July)
• Re: What is a text? (was Re: Back to Principle 1) (Monday, 17 July)
• What is a text? (was Re: Back to Principle 1) (Monday, 17 July)
• Re: Back to Principle 1 (Monday, 17 July)
• Re: Back to Principle 1 (Monday, 17 July)
• Restatement of Principle 2 (Sunday, 16 July)
• Coverage of cognitive considerations in new guidelines draft (Friday, 14 July)
• Re: New guidelines draft (Friday, 14 July)
• Re: New guidelines draft (Friday, 14 July)
• RE: New guidelines draft (Friday, 14 July)
• Re: The principal principles (Thursday, 13 July)
• New guidelines draft (Thursday, 13 July)
• Action items from previous meetings (Wednesday, 12 July)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 12 July)
• Review of Techniques document prior to publication (Saturday, 8 July)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 5 July)

Jim Allan

• RE: Guide to Guidelines (Monday, 11 September)

Jim Knight

• Re: Attention Bulk Emailers: Bulk Friendly Services! (Wednesday, 9 August)

Jim Thatcher

• RE: Information on support in speech synthesizers of language switching (Thursday, 10 August)

Jon Gunderson

• Pelase review before UA telecon today (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding* (Wednesday, 27 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)

jonathan chetwynd

• Symbols and literacy, 2 Grants in the UK (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: Plain english with examples! (Friday, 11 August)
• Re: Plain english with examples! (Friday, 11 August)
• Re: AU WG joining us for an afternoon at F2F in Bristol? (Saturday, 5 August)
• Re: AU WG joining us for an afternoon at F2F in Bristol? (Wednesday, 2 August)

Judy Brewer

• WAI in ten points? [was: Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>] (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: Penn State Accessibility Website - a model for future work? (Wednesday, 12 July)

Katie Haritos-Shea

• RE: WCAG home page reorganization (Tuesday, 26 September)
• RE:Guide to the Guidelines (Thursday, 14 September)
• FW: My Action Item VERY LATE sorry (Monday, 11 September)
• FW: My Action Item VERY LATE sorry (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: William (Sunday, 10 September)
• FW: Critiques of Techniques (Tuesday, 11 July)
• Critiques of Techniques (Monday, 10 July)

Kynn Bartlett

• RE: Strawman Proposal: WCAG 2.0 Compliance (Sunday, 1 October)
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken (Sunday, 1 October)
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken (Saturday, 30 September)
• Interesting Position Paper for DIW (Saturday, 30 September)
• Strawman Proposal: WCAG 2.0 Compliance (Saturday, 30 September)
• XML and XSLT Versions of Draft WCAG 2.0 (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: Terminology Problem: "Avoid" (Friday, 29 September)
• Terminology Problem: "Avoid" (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding* (Friday, 29 September)
• Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding* (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding* (Wednesday, 27 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• RE: Brain dump on advantages and disadvantages of different types of content (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: Cut off for registration for F2F is Friday, 29 October. (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: Updated WCAG 1.0 Techniques published as Note (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: author-defined content vs. "primary" content (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Book Recommendation and User Testing Proposal (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: Guide to Guidelines (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: "hidden" explanations (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: Guide to Guidelines (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: Guide to Guidelines (Tuesday, 12 September)
• RE: My Action Item VERY LATE sorry (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: Guide to Guidelines (Monday, 11 September)
• Regrets for Thursday, 14 September (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: "intro" (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: "intro" (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: "intro" (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: Agenda (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Regrets for Today (8/24) (Thursday, 24 August)
• Re: Clarification of checkpoint 7.4 (Thursday, 24 August)
• Re: Making class more accessible (Wednesday, 23 August)
• Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0 (Saturday, 19 August)
• Re: Clarification of checkpoint 7.4 (Saturday, 19 August)
• Re: Clarification of checkpoint 7.4 (Friday, 18 August)
• Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0 (Friday, 18 August)
• Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0 (Friday, 18 August)
• Re: Normative or informative? (Friday, 18 August)
• Re: principles (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: principles (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: literacy? (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: Principles of Web Accessibility (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Strata and Terminology: Proposed WD-WCAG20-20000726 (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Strata and Terminology: WCAG 1.0 Techniques (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Strata and Terminology: WCAG 1.0 (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: Investigating terminology & structure with HTML examples (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Principles of Web Accessibility (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: Kynn's WCAG Proposal (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: Comments on 26 July 2000 WCAG 2.0 Draft (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Kynn's WCAG Proposal (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: Terminology (Tuesday, 15 August)

Laurence Bergman

• RE: Penn State Accessibility Website - a model for future work? (Wednesday, 12 July)

Leonard R. Kasday

• Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding* (Friday, 29 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Wednesday, 27 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Wednesday, 27 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Suggestion for Technique document: LINK element and skipping links (Monday, 28 August)
• Re: Making class more accessible (Wednesday, 23 August)
• Making class more accessible (Wednesday, 23 August)
• popup question (Friday, 21 July)
• Re: User Survey: accesskey (Thursday, 6 July)

Linda+Dale@LindaleUSA.com

• Helping Kids in the USA (Friday, 8 September)

lisa

• article (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: "intro" (Thursday, 7 September)

lisa kestenbaum

• Re: Updated WCAG 1.0 Techniques published as Note (Thursday, 21 September)
• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: Rewording for the masses (Sunday, 27 August)
• Re: Compliance matrix (Was: Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0) (Sunday, 27 August)
• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Friday, 18 August)
• Re: CfP W3C Device Independent Authoring Workshop (Sunday, 6 August)
• Re: AU WG joining us for an afternoon at F2F in Bristol? (Friday, 4 August)

Lisa Seeman

• RE: my action item (Thursday, 28 September)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding* (Thursday, 28 September)
• my action item (Thursday, 28 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Wednesday, 27 September)
• RE: Brain dump on advantages and disadvantages of different types of content (Wednesday, 27 September)
• RE: Brain dump on advantages and disadvantages of different types of content (Tuesday, 26 September)
• the changes (Friday, 22 September)

Loretta Guarino Reid

• Re: Comments and edits for the DRAFT WCAG 2.0 (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Request to Join (Friday, 11 August)

m. may

• Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0 (Sunday, 20 August)
• Request to Join (Friday, 4 August)

Marja-Riitta Koivunen

• Re: Important? (Friday, 11 August)
• mirroring problems (Thursday, 20 July)

Marshall Jansen

• Action Item from 24 August (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: Kynn's WCAG Proposal (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Regrets (belated) for today's meeting. (Thursday, 10 August)
• Action Item: Investigate portals for PDA support (Thursday, 13 July)

Marti

• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: Trial A (Saturday, 26 August)
• Normative ? (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: Kynn's WCAG Proposal (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: minimal/tersified abstract generalized principles (Thursday, 27 July)
• Re: Status of RTF format? (Thursday, 20 July)
• Back to Principle 1 (Sunday, 16 July)
• Re: New guidelines draft (Thursday, 13 July)
• Re: New guidelines draft (Thursday, 13 July)
• Re: Agenda (Wednesday, 5 July)

Masafumi NAKANE

• Re: Investigating terminology & structure with HTML examples (Tuesday, 15 August)
• comment on tech for WCAG 1.0 (Aug 8) (Tuesday, 15 August)

MeetBuyer.com

• Fastest World Wide Business Network. (Saturday, 1 July)

Mike Paciello

• RE: Principles (Thursday, 7 September)

Mike Williams

• Re: Flash and WCAG (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Flash and WCAG (Thursday, 14 September)
• Request to Join Web Content Guidelines Working Group (Monday, 11 September)

Nelson

• Market 2000. Comercio Electronico en la Red, Sin Secretos.!!UNICO¡¡ (Saturday, 22 July)

nile333@kadet.co.uk

• So, How in the heck have you been? (Thursday, 21 September)
• So, How in the heck have you been? (Wednesday, 20 September)

Nilesh Singit

• Request to Join (Friday, 7 July)

Pawson, David

• RE: Making class more accessible (Thursday, 24 August)

Pelaez, Marco

• Re: new version (Thursday, 27 July)

Phill Jenkins/Austin/IBM

• Re: the title and name tags for frames (migration) (Monday, 25 September)

pjenkins@us.ibm.com

• Select menus and style (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Re: Information on support in speech synthesizers of language switching (Thursday, 10 August)

Please read this carefully!

• Do You want to earn $3000-$4000 or more per month? (Saturday, 12 August)

Please read this carefully!!!

• Do You want to earn $3000 or more per month?! Vi hotite zarabativat $3000 i bolee v mesjac?! (Sunday, 30 July)
• Do You want earn $3000 or more per month?! Vi hotite zarabativat $3000 i bolee v mesjac?! (Wednesday, 26 July)
• Do You want earn $3000 or more per month?! Vi hotite zarabativat $3000 i bolee v mesjac?! (Sunday, 9 July)

Poehlman, David

• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)
• RE: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant (Tuesday, 26 September)

Real Name

• Re: Guide to Guidelines (Sunday, 17 September)

Robert Neff

• Adobe prepares accessible PDF reader (Sunday, 27 August)
• Re: Compliance matrix (Was: Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0) (Sunday, 27 August)
• remarks (Saturday, 26 August)
• Re: Compliance matrix (Was: Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0) (Saturday, 26 August)
• Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0 (Saturday, 19 August)
• Re: Comments on New (8/8) Techniques Working Draft (Friday, 18 August)

Rosemary Smith

• AdvertExpress - the UK's largest advertising marketplace (Wednesday, 27 September)

Rural Property Insider

• W3C-WAI-GL - Rural Property - The Complete Guide uzae zkbxscpn (Monday, 10 July)

sammy@communication411.com

• Are you looking for a J.O.B. or Financial Freedom? osvdh (Sunday, 6 August)

Sarah S. Lyon

• New E-mail address (Saturday, 23 September)

scholars@us.net

• Tuition-Free Computer and IT Training for Non-Profit Employees (Friday, 21 July)

sdcsoiji@adeos.manage.kanazawa-it.ac.jp

• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Friday, 8 September)

seeman

• My action item, minus a few typos (Monday, 18 September)
• my action item, (Sunday, 17 September)
• we may have a new issue (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: a whole new headache? (Thursday, 14 September)
• Fw: a whole new headache? (Thursday, 14 September)
• a whole new headache? (Thursday, 14 September)
• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Monday, 11 September)
• Fw: Guide to Guidelines -Oops (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: Guide to Guidelines (Monday, 11 September)
• easy to follow format (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: "intro" (Thursday, 7 September)

sfaquestions@sendflowersamerica.com

• FlowerFunds - Fund Raising Program (Wednesday, 30 August)

Sniegowski, Eugene

• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Thursday, 21 September)

suscripcion@actualidadempresarial.com

• Actualidad empresarial (c553) (Wednesday, 27 September)

tford@ctv.es

• Musicians Resources Europe (Tuesday, 12 September)

the hit factory.net

• this might be of interest (Wednesday, 27 September)
• NETWORKING * COMPUTER REPAIR * INSTRUCTION * WEB PAGE DESIGN * STREAMING * CD ROM PRESENTATIONS * WE ARE YOUR ONE-STOP-SHOP LOCATED IN DOWNTOWN NYC!!!! (Sunday, 10 September)

Tim Noonan

• RE: New guidelines draft (Thursday, 13 July)

Vivian Li

• You win a free Portable H.F.(HK$190) for use of outdoor & driving car! (Monday, 21 August)

Wendy A Chisholm

• Links to test pages (Thursday, 28 September)
• correct URI: 28 September 2000 telecon minutes (Thursday, 28 September)
• 28 September 2000 telecon minutes (Thursday, 28 September)
• New draft, new change log, updated issues list (Thursday, 28 September)
• Navigating an application (Thursday, 28 September)
• Beyond the page - applications (Thursday, 28 September)
• Updated Home Page (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: Updated WCAG 1.0 Techniques published as Note (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: Action Item from 24 August (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: Flash and WCAG (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: Cut off for registration for F2F is Friday, 29 October. (Monday, 25 September)
• WCAG home page reorganization (Monday, 25 September)
• Cut off for registration for F2F is Friday, 29 October. (Monday, 25 September)
• Updated WCAG 1.0 Techniques published as Note (Thursday, 21 September)
• Proposed "plenary" W3C WG session (Friday, 15 September)
• Jason's latest draft (Friday, 15 September)
• minutes from 14 sept. meeting (Thursday, 14 September)
• Updated Techniques issues list (Wednesday, 13 September)
• An Excerpt From the NBA Tape Recording Manual now online (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Friday, 8 September)
• Axes of debate: are they already defined in the requirements document?? (Thursday, 7 September)
• Minutes from 7 Sept. 2000 telecon (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: Principles (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: "intro" (Thursday, 7 September)
• Fwd: Follow Up: Open Source for the Visually Impaired (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Please Review: New WCAG 1.0 Techniques document (Sunday, 27 August)
• Please register: Registration for October F2F meetings now available (Friday, 25 August)
• Minutes from 24 August 2000 (Thursday, 24 August)
• Re: Clarification of checkpoint 7.4 (also known as: calling all volunteers) (Thursday, 24 August)
• notes for today's call (Thursday, 24 August)
• Compliance matrix (Was: Re: Organizing WCAG 2.0) (Thursday, 24 August)
• Re: Clarification of checkpoint 7.4 (Thursday, 24 August)
• Re: Clarification of checkpoint 7.4 (Thursday, 24 August)
• Please Review: Draft of technology-specific checkpoints (Wednesday, 23 August)
• positioning labels (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Clarification of checkpoint 7.4 (Friday, 18 August)
• Normative or informative? (Friday, 18 August)
• Minutes from 17 August 2000 telecon (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: DHTML menus and accessibility (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: recommended reading and 13 rules for accessible web design (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: Comments on 26 July 2000 WCAG 2.0 Draft (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: Comments and edits for the DRAFT WCAG 2.0 (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Draft Reformulation, p.s. (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Updated draft of Reformulation of WCAG (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Dicussion is generating open issues! (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Investigating terminology & structure with HTML examples (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Minutes from 10 August 2000 telecon (Thursday, 10 August)
• Plain english with examples! (Thursday, 10 August)
• Re: use of hotspots and relative units (Thursday, 10 August)
• Re: element to accessability mapping? (Thursday, 10 August)
• Draft Reformulation of WCAG 2.0 - published 26 July 2000 (Tuesday, 8 August)
• Face-to-face meetings 5/6 October in Bristol, England (Tuesday, 8 August)
• New Techniques Working Draft (Tuesday, 8 August)
• Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Friday, 4 August)
• Discussion and proposed wording for Errata for checkpoint 7.4 (Friday, 4 August)
• Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Friday, 4 August)
• Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Thursday, 3 August)
• Re: AU WG joining us for an afternoon at F2F in Bristol? (Thursday, 3 August)
• AU WG joining us for an afternoon at F2F in Bristol? (Tuesday, 1 August)
• Internationalization guidelines (Tuesday, 1 August)
• Latest draft of principles and guidelines (Friday, 28 July)
• Request for review to IG (Friday, 28 July)
• Minutes from 27 July 2000 telecon (Thursday, 27 July)
• Please review: Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (Thursday, 27 July)
• Face2face October 5/6 in Bristol? (Tuesday, 25 July)
• regrets for today's call (Thursday, 20 July)
• new techniques draft, ready to send to IG? (Thursday, 20 July)
• use of tabindex [was: Re: Proposal for Technique 13.6.1 Grouping links] (Tuesday, 18 July)
• Re: Proposal for Technique 13.6.1 Grouping links (Monday, 17 July)
• Jason's draft posted to WAI GL site as HTML document (Thursday, 13 July)
• minutes from 13 july telecon (Thursday, 13 July)
• RE: Penn State Accessibility Website - a model for future work? (Thursday, 13 July)
• Penn State Accessibility Website - a model for future work? (Wednesday, 12 July)
• Author's evaluation and Color-blind questionnaire page (Friday, 7 July)
• Specifiying font sizes with FONT, an accessibility issue? (Friday, 7 July)
• Generalized checkpoints and technology-specific checkpoints (Thursday, 6 July)
• minutes from 6 july telecon (Thursday, 6 July)
• Updated requirements doc (Thursday, 6 July)
• Fwd: Summary of the User Survey: Browsers and Scripting (Thursday, 6 July)
• User Survey: accesskey (Wednesday, 5 July)
• New Techniques document: focus on updating CSS techniques (Wednesday, 5 July)
• Re: Minutes from 29 June 2000 telecon (Monday, 3 July)

William Loughborough

• Re: Strawman Proposal: WCAG 2.0 Compliance (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: Terminology Problem: "Avoid" (Friday, 29 September)
• usability testing (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: Alt="" or " "? (Friday, 29 September)
• WCAG 2 comments (Thursday, 28 September)
• RE: Alt="" or " "? (Thursday, 28 September)
• Alt="" or " "? (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: 28 September 2000 telecon minutes (Thursday, 28 September)
• Slogan? (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: Updated Home Page (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: my action item (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding* (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding* (Wednesday, 27 September)
• RE: Brain dump on advantages and disadvantages of different types of content (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: Brain dump on advantages and disadvantages of different types of content (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: Cut off for registration for F2F is Friday, 29 October. (Monday, 25 September)
• accessibility and text revisited (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Thursday, 21 September)
• checklist checker (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: Book Recommendation and User Testing Proposal (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Principles (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: Terminology revisited (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: Terminology revisited (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: Terminology revisited (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: minutes from 14 sept. meeting (Thursday, 14 September)
• charter scope (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: clear & simple (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: clear & simple (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 14 September)
• clear & simple (Wednesday, 13 September)
• "hidden" explanations (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: Revised text of guidelines in response to action item (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: FW: My Action Item VERY LATE sorry (Tuesday, 12 September)
• RE: Guide to Guidelines (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: Guide to Guidelines (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: Guide to Guidelines (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: FW: My Action Item VERY LATE sorry (Monday, 11 September)
• Guide to Guidelines (Sunday, 10 September)
• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Friday, 8 September)
• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Friday, 8 September)
• Principles (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: article (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: "intro" (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: Agenda (Wednesday, 6 September)
• "intro" (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: standard terms [was: Re: Trial A] (Sunday, 27 August)
• Trial A (Friday, 25 August)
• walk the walk? (Wednesday, 23 August)
• tech-specific checkpoints (Wednesday, 23 August)
• Re: principles (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: literacy? (Thursday, 17 August)
• literacy? (Thursday, 17 August)
• principles (Wednesday, 16 August)
• recommended reading (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: Principles of Web Accessibility (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: Investigating terminology & structure with HTML examples (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Re: Comments on 26 July 2000 WCAG 2.0 Draft (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: Kynn's WCAG Proposal (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: Kynn's WCAG Proposal (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: Terminology (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: Comments and edits for the DRAFT WCAG 2.0 (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: Comments on 26 July 2000 WCAG 2.0 Draft (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: stylish semantics (Thursday, 10 August)
• Important? (Thursday, 10 August)
• RE: Techniques for 2.2.3 (Thursday, 10 August)
• Re: Draft Reformulation of WCAG 2.0 - published 26 July 2000 (Tuesday, 8 August)
• stylish semantics (Tuesday, 8 August)
• Re: CfP W3C Device Independent Authoring Workshop (Sunday, 6 August)
• Re: Clarification Of Technique 1.3 (Thursday, 3 August)
• Re: AU WG joining us for an afternoon at F2F in Bristol? (Tuesday, 1 August)
• Re: minimal/tersified abstract generalized principles (Thursday, 27 July)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 27 July)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 27 July)
• minimal/tersified abstract generalized principles (Thursday, 27 July)
• Re: Face2face October 5/6 in Bristol? (Tuesday, 25 July)
• Re: principles (Thursday, 20 July)
• principles (Thursday, 20 July)
• Re: Status of RTF format? (Thursday, 20 July)
• Re: new techniques draft, ready to send to IG? (Thursday, 20 July)
• Re: Back to Principle 1 (Sunday, 16 July)
• Re: New guidelines draft (Thursday, 13 July)
• The principal principles (Thursday, 13 July)
• Re: generalization/abstraction (Wednesday, 12 July)

Last message date: Saturday, 30 September 2000 22:23:57 UTC