- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 10:56:24 -0700
- To: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <unagi69@concentric.net>
- Cc: User Agent Guidelines Emailing List <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>, Web Content Accessiblity Guidelines Mailing List <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 09:13 PM 9/18/2000 , Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote: >i strenuously object to any such classification of content along the lines of "primary" and "secondary" -- like it or not, it implies an objective (albeit fallacious) hierarchy of importance, based upon a purely phenomenological interpretation of content... I have to agree with Gregory; it is simply incorrect to label one modality of content as primary and the other as secondary based purely on the medium of that content. Such language can easily give incorrect impressions. --Kynn, even though you didn't explicitly ask _my_ opinion :) -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com/ Director of Accessibility, Edapta http://www.edapta.com/ Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://www.idyllmtn.com/ AWARE Center Director http://www.awarecenter.org/ Accessibility Roundtable Web Broadcast http://kynn.com/+on24 What's on my bookshelf? http://kynn.com/books/
Received on Wednesday, 20 September 2000 14:12:48 UTC