w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from October 2001 by date

Thursday, 1 November 2001

• heading toward datatyping telecon Sergey Melnik
• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Wednesday, 31 October 2001

• Re: Test Case doc updated jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Test Case doc updated Art Barstow

Tuesday, 30 October 2001

• Re: datatypes [was Re: Argh!] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: datatypes [was Re: Argh!] Sergey Melnik

Monday, 29 October 2001

• Re: datatypes [was Re: Argh!] Graham Klyne
• datatypes [was Re: Argh!] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Argh! Sergey Melnik
• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) Sergey Melnik
• Re: Reject change to rdf:value Sergey Melnik
• Re: Reject change to rdf:value Dave Beckett
• Re: Reject change to rdf:value (was Re: Comments to item 11 of agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-26) Graham Klyne

Saturday, 27 October 2001

• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2001-10-26 Brian McBride
• new Web Ontology WG announced Dan Brickley
• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: Objections to postponing issues Sergey Melnik
• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) Sergey Melnik

Friday, 26 October 2001

• XML Schema datatypes: real world usage of gMonth (fwd) Dan Brickley
• Re: ACTION: 2001-10-19#9 - constraint resources (proposed dropping of) Dan Brickley
• Re: ACTION: 2001-10-19#9 - constraint resources (proposed dropping of) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: Objections to postponing issues Pat Hayes
• Re: ACTION: 2001-10-19#9 - constraint resources (proposed dropping of) Pat Hayes
• Re: RDFS spec: range/domain wordsmithing -- help needed Pat Hayes
• Reject change to rdf:value (was Re: Comments to item 11 of agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-26) Pat Hayes
• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2001-10-26 Stephen Petschulat/CanWest/IBM
• RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2001-10-26 Stephen Petschulat/CanWest/IBM
• Objections to postponing issues Aaron Swartz
• Re: Minutes: Syntax subgroup teleconf - Oct 26, 2001 Graham Klyne
• Test case for duplicate properties Art Barstow
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Pat Hayes
• Minutes: Syntax subgroup teleconf - Oct 26, 2001 Art Barstow
• ACTION: 2001-10-19#9 - constraint resources (proposed dropping of) Dan Brickley
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Graham Klyne
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Graham Klyne
• Comments to Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-26 Graham Klyne
• Comments to item 11 of agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-26 Graham Klyne
• Re: RDFS spec: range/domain wordsmithing -- help needed Graham Klyne
• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) John Cowan
• Re: cheating about reification Sergey Melnik

Thursday, 25 October 2001

• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Pat Hayes
• Re: A strange question Pat Hayes
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Pat Hayes
• Re: A strange question Pat Hayes
• RDFS spec: range/domain wordsmithing -- help needed Dan Brickley
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-26 Pat Hayes
• Re: cheating about reification Pat Hayes
• How many answers? (was: Re: existential answers to queries (was: Re: on behalf of sandro)) Pat Hayes
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-26 Sergey Melnik
• How many answers? (was: Re: existential answers to queries (was: Re: on behalf of sandro)) Pat Hayes
• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data modelsection) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) Sergey Melnik
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-26 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: A strange question jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) Sergey Melnik
• Re: A strange question Brian McBride
• Re: A strange question Graham Klyne
• Re: Musing about "reification" Graham Klyne
• Re: A strange question Brian McBride
• Re: weekly call for agenda items Pat Hayes
• Re: A strange question Pat Hayes
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Frank Manola
• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) Pat Hayes
• Re: suggestions for datatyping (long) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: cheating about reification Sergey Melnik
• RE: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Pat Hayes
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Frank Manola
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-26 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Re: cheating about reification Pat Hayes
• Re: A strange question jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: entailment test case etc001 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: weekly call for agenda items Art Barstow
• Re: PRIMER: some text on striping - useful? Art Barstow
• Re: Minutes of 19-Oct-2001 teleconference Brian McBride
• RE: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Jeremy Carroll
• cheating about reification Sergey Melnik
• suggestions for datatyping (long) Sergey Melnik

Wednesday, 24 October 2001

• Re: Concrete datatype use case Pat Hayes
• A strange question Pat Hayes
• Re: Musing about "reification" Pat Hayes
• Re: Concrete datatype use case Graham Klyne
• Musing about "reification" Graham Klyne
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about Pat Hayes
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Pat Hayes
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Pat Hayes
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Pat Hayes
• Re: Test cases for parseType mis-spelling errors Brian McBride
• Re: Test cases for parseType mis-spelling errors Art Barstow
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Frank Manola
• New email address Frank Boumphrey
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Brian McBride
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Frank Manola
• weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• Re: Concrete datatype use case Brian McBride
• Re: entailment test case etc001 Pat Hayes
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Pat Hayes
• RE: Why reification doesn't make sense (was: Re: PRIMER: PrimerReificationSection) Pat Hayes
• Re: Concrete datatype use case Graham Klyne
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about Graham Klyne
• Re: Proposal to incorporate datatyping into the model theory (was Re: datatyping discussion) Graham Klyne
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Brian McBride
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• RDF Core Syntax Teleconference Logistics Eric Miller
• RE: Why reification doesn't make sense (was: Re: PRIMER: PrimerReificationSection) dehora
• Syntax issues to be discussed / resolved Dave Beckett
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Frank Manola
• Re: PRIMER: PrimerReificationSection Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• PRIMER: some text on striping - useful? Dan Brickley
• Re: entailment test case etc001 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• RE: SYNTAX: anon nodes (was RDF Syntax Telecon Friday) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday Jan Grant
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Brian McBride
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Brian McBride
• RE: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday Pat Hayes
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Pat Hayes
• Re: entailment test case etc001 Pat Hayes
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) Pat Hayes
• Re: Concrete datatype use case Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal to incorporate datatyping into the model theory (was Re: datatyping discussion) Pat Hayes
• Why reification doesn't make sense (was: Re: PRIMER: PrimerReificationSection) Pat Hayes
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Pat Hayes
• Re: complex numbers Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal to incorporate datatyping into the model theory (was Re: datatyping discussion) Pat Hayes
• Re: literals must be self-evident Pat Hayes
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Pat Hayes
• Re: use case challenge (was: Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr) Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 23 October 2001

• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) dehora
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) Pat Hayes
• Re: Active issue rdfms-graph; formal description of properties ofan RDF graph Pat Hayes
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) Pat Hayes
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Concrete datatype use case Brian McBride
• Re: Concrete datatype use case Jeremy Carroll
• Concrete datatype use case Brian McBride
• Re: Proposal to incorporate datatyping into the model theory (was Re: datatyping discussion) Brian McBride
• complex numbers Jeremy Carroll
• RE: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work Jeremy Carroll
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work Frank Manola
• Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Graham Klyne
• Re: Proposal to incorporate datatyping into the model theory (was Re: datatyping discussion) Graham Klyne
• Re: datatyping discussion Graham Klyne
• Re: I18N issues proposed issues and postponement Martin Duerst
• Re: datatyping discussion Brian McBride
• Re: literals must be self-evident Brian McBride
• Re: datatyping discussion Sergey Melnik
• use case challenge (was: Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr) Sergey Melnik
• Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Pat Hayes
• What is reification? (was Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr) Pat Hayes
• Re: PRIMER: PrimerReificationSection dehora

Monday, 22 October 2001

• Re: interpetation properties 2 Pat Hayes
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work Pat Hayes
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Pat Hayes
• Proposal to incorporate datatyping into the model theory (was Re: datatyping discussion) Pat Hayes
• Re: DPH Jeremy Carroll
• Re: F2F at Tech Plenary 25th Feb - 1 Mar 2002 Sergey Melnik
• Re: datatyping discussion jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: datatyping discussion Pat Hayes
• Re: datatyping discussion Pat Hayes
• Re: literals must be self-evident Pat Hayes
• Re: literals must be self-evident Pat Hayes
• RE: DPH Ron Daniel
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section Pat Hayes
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Frank Manola
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Frank Manola
• Re: Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Brian McBride

Tuesday, 16 October 2001

• Properties not predicates (was Re: PRIMER: draft data model section) Pat Hayes
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section Pat Hayes
• Re: DPH Pat Hayes
• Re: Literals as subjects, labels for nodes Pat Hayes

Monday, 22 October 2001

• RE: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Bill de hOra
• I18N issues proposed issues and postponement Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) Martin Duerst

Sunday, 21 October 2001

• Regrets, telecon this Friday Graham Klyne
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) Jan Grant
• Re: Test cases for parseType mis-spelling errors Graham Klyne
• Re: Active issue rdfms-graph; formal description of properties ofan RDF graph Graham Klyne
• entailment test case etc001 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) Brian McBride

Saturday, 20 October 2001

• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) Dan Connolly
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) Dan Brickley
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) Brian McBride
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) Brian McBride
• Re: Active issue rdfms-graph; formal description of properties ofan RDF graph Dan Connolly
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) Dan Connolly
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) Dan Connolly
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) Dan Connolly
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) Brian McBride
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) Brian McBride
• Re: Test cases for parseType mis-spelling errors Brian McBride
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) Brian McBride
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) Brian McBride
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) Brian McBride

Friday, 19 October 2001

• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) Graham Klyne
• Re: use of log:semantics Graham Klyne
• Re: Triples doc for review (with XSLT) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Triples doc for review (without XSLT) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: use of log:semantics jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Minutes of 19-Oct-2001 teleconference Graham Klyne
• RE: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) Francois Yergeau
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: use of log:semantics Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) Jeremy Carroll
• Triples doc for review (later) Jeremy Carroll
• Formats for HTTP Proxy Caches Aaron Swartz
• Re: parseType case sensitivity of values? (was Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-19) Art Barstow
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) Dan Connolly
• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) Dan Connolly
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) Jan Grant
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) Jeremy Carroll
• RDF/XML Syntax WD work-in-progress for review Dave Beckett
• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: parseType case sensitivity of values? (was Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-19) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Jeremy Carroll
• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) Mark Davis
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (use cases/test inputs, please?) Dan Connolly
• RE: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) Francois Yergeau
• parseType case sensitivity of values? (was Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-19) Eric Miller
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Graham Klyne
• Re: datatyping discussion Martyn Horner
• Re: F2F at Tech Plenary 25th Feb - 1 Mar 2002 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: datatyping discussion Brian McBride
• RE: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Jeremy Carroll
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Jeremy Carroll
• Re: F2F at Tech Plenary 25th Feb - 1 Mar 2002 Jeremy Carroll
• F2F at Tech Plenary 25th Feb - 1 Mar 2002 Brian McBride
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Jan Grant
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Bill de hOra
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Jeremy Carroll
• regrets Bill de hOra
• Re: 2001-10-12#2 - review rdfs-domain-and-range TCs jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: *way* off topic [Was: Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr] Brian McBride
• Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Dan Connolly
• Re: use of log:semantics jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• *way* off topic [Was: Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr] Art Barstow
• Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 18 October 2001

• Re: use of log:semantics Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (was Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work ) Dave Beckett
• Re: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (was Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work ) Brian McBride
• Updated: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-19 Brian McBride
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-19 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Test cases for parseType mis-spelling errors Jeremy Carroll
• Test cases for parseType mis-spelling errors Art Barstow
• action #2001-09-28/7 remove xml:base from test cases Brian McBride
• RE: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work Jeremy Carroll
• Re: literals must be self-evident Bill de hOra
• Re: literals must be self-evident Bill de hOra
• Agenda will be late Brian McBride
• Re: literals must be self-evident Dan Connolly
• Re: datatyping discussion Graham Klyne
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work Dave Beckett
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work Jeremy Carroll
• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work Jeremy Carroll
• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) Martin Duerst
• Re: literals must be self-evident Jeremy Carroll
• datatyping discussion Sergey Melnik

Wednesday, 17 October 2001

• interpetation properties 2 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) Graham Klyne
• Re: literals must be self-evident Graham Klyne
• RE: literals must be self-evident Ron Daniel
• literals must be self-evident Dan Connolly
• Re: I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work Dave Beckett
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work Dave Beckett
• Re: PRIMER: PrimerReificationSection Bill de hOra
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work Dan Connolly
• Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr (was Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work ) Dave Beckett
• Weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• I18N (was: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about) Graham Klyne
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work Art Barstow
• Re: PRIMER: PrimerReificationSection jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• PRIMER: PrimerReificationSection Bill de hOra
• SYNTAX: triple production Jeremy Carroll
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-is-xml-structure) Dave Beckett
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-is-xml-structure) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) Dave Beckett
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (editorial) Dave Beckett
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) Brian McBride
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work Dave Beckett
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (editorial) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: 2001-10-12#2 - review rdfs-domain-and-range TCs jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work Jeremy Carroll
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: DPH Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) Bill de hOra
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section Bill de hOra

Tuesday, 16 October 2001

• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) Frank Manola
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (editorial) Dave Beckett
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) Aaron Swartz
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) Brian McBride
• Re: Issue Tracking doc needs test case link updates Brian McBride
• Re: future F2F meetings Brian McBride
• future F2F meetings Frank Manola
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section Frank Manola
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (editorial) Dan Connolly
• Re: Where is the SW going? (was Re: Expressiveness of RDF as Rule Conclusion Language (was Re: What is an RDF Query? )) Pat Hayes
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section Frank Manola
• SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work Dave Beckett
• Re: ACTION 2001-10-12#5: frankm respond to gk text Frank Manola
• Re: Literals as subjects, labels for nodes Dave Beckett
• Re: Literals as subjects, labels for nodes Jan Grant
• Re: Literals as subjects, labels for nodes Pat Hayes
• DPH Ron Daniel
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) Jan Grant
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? Graham Klyne
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) Pat Hayes
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) Art Barstow
• RE: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) Ron Daniel
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? Dan Connolly
• 2001-10-12#4: gk to bring this back to table [anon issue] Graham Klyne
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) Art Barstow
• Re: Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) Art Barstow
• RE: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? Graham Klyne
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Graham Klyne
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Dave Beckett
• Dilbert Brian McBride
• Re: Ntriples++ (was Re: Banishing "bNode") Dave Beckett
• Literals as subjects, labels for nodes Dave Beckett
• Re: ACTION 2001-10-12#5: frankm respond to gk text Pat Hayes
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Dave Beckett
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) Pat Hayes
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Pat Hayes
• Re: N-Triples and Unicode string values Pat Hayes
• ACTION 2001-10-12#1: Pat Pat Hayes
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section Pat Hayes
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section Pat Hayes
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? Aaron Swartz
• Closing rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) Aaron Swartz
• Re: Banishing "bNode" Pat Hayes

Monday, 15 October 2001

• Re: ACTION 2001-10-12#5: frankm respond to gk text Sergey Melnik
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) Sergey Melnik
• RE: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) Pat Hayes
• RE: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? Pat Hayes
• Issue Tracking doc needs test case link updates Art Barstow
• Ntriples++ (was Re: Banishing "bNode") Pat Hayes
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Dan Connolly
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Sergey Melnik
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Dan Connolly
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Sergey Melnik
• 2001-10-12#2 - review rdfs-domain-and-range TCs Art Barstow
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? Dave Beckett
• N-Triples and Unicode string values Jeremy Carroll
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section Bill de hOra
• status ACTION 2001-10-12#3 and #6 (Was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Very off-topic: citing emails Graham Klyne
• RE: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? Bill de hOra
• RE: RDF draft structure (was: Schedule) Bill de hOra
• RE: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? Jeremy Carroll
• RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-10-12 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [Fwd: Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-12] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section Frank Manola
• Re: Banishing "bNode" Dave Beckett
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Dan Brickley
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Graham Klyne
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Jan Grant
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Dave Beckett
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Jan Grant
• RE: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) Ron Daniel
• RE: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? Ron Daniel
• Re: PRIMER: draft data model section Aaron Swartz
• Banishing "bNode" Pat Hayes

Sunday, 14 October 2001

• PRIMER: draft data model section Frank Manola
• Re: ACTION 2001-10-12#5: frankm respond to gk text Pat Hayes
• Re: ACTION 2001-10-12#5: frankm respond to gk text Frank Manola
• Re: RDF draft structure (was: Schedule) Aaron Swartz
• Re: RDF draft structure (was: Schedule) Dan Brickley
• RDF draft structure (was: Schedule) Aaron Swartz
• RE: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? dehora
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? dehora
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? Dan Connolly
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? dehora

Saturday, 13 October 2001

• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? Dan Connolly
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? dehora
• Re: ACTION 2001-10-12#5: frankm respond to gk text Dan Connolly
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Dan Connolly
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Dan Connolly
• PRIMER: RDF/SW in context talk -- raw materials for primer? Dan Brickley
• Re: ACTION 2001-10-12#5: frankm respond to gk text Frank Manola
• Re: Interpretation property jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) Pat Hayes
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Pat Hayes
• Re: ACTION 2001-10-12#5: frankm respond to gk text Pat Hayes
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Sergey Melnik

Friday, 12 October 2001

• ACTION 2001-10-12#5: frankm respond to gk text Frank Manola
• after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects) Ron Daniel
• Re: Schedule Dan Connolly
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Pat Hayes
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Pat Hayes
• RE: Schedule Ron Daniel
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Sergey Melnik
• Regrets Pat Hayes
• [Fwd: Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-12] Brian McBride
• Schedule Brian McBride
• PRIMER status (was Re: PRIMER: contributions) Eric Miller
• Re: PRIMER: contributions Eric Miller
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Brian McBride
• Re: PRIMER: contributions Frank Manola
• Re: PRIMER: contributions Dan Brickley
• PRIMER: contributions Martyn Horner
• regrets dehora
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Dave Beckett
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: 2001-09-28#9 - proposal for obsoleting test cases Brian McBride
• Re: 2001-09-28#9 - proposal for obsoleting test cases Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Active issue rdfms-graph; formal description of properties of an RDF graph Graham Klyne
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? Graham Klyne
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Brian McBride

Thursday, 11 October 2001

• Re: Active issue rdfms-graph; formal description of properties of an RDF graph Pat Hayes
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? Dan Connolly
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? Dan Connolly
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Pat Hayes
• Re: Active issue rdfms-graph; formal description of properties of an RDF graph Dan Connolly
• Re: 2001-09-28#9 - proposal for obsoleting test cases Art Barstow
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Dan Connolly
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Graham Klyne
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Dan Connolly
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Brian McBride
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (#rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure) Aaron Swartz
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Art Barstow
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Dan Connolly
• Active issue rdfms-graph; formal description of properties of an RDF graph Pat Hayes
• Re: 2001-09-28#9 - proposal for obsoleting test cases Jeremy Carroll
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-10-12 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• 2001-09-28#4 - review rdfs-no-cycles-in-subPropertyOf test case Art Barstow
• 2001-09-28#9 - proposal for obsoleting test cases & repo management Art Barstow
• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-09-28 Brian McBride
• Re: Actions/Decisions from the RDFCore Telecon 2001-09-28 Brian McBride
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF graph model limited by RDF/xml 1.0 syntax? Frank Manola
• Action 2001-09-28#13 show Sergey as owner of rdfs-xml-datatypes Brian McBride
• Re: Test cases for parseType="Literal" Dave Beckett
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Pat Hayes
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Test cases for parseType="Literal" Aaron Swartz
• Re: Test cases for parseType="Literal" Aaron Swartz
• Re: golden triples Aaron Swartz

Wednesday, 10 October 2001

• Re: model theory and literals Graham Klyne
• Re: model theory and literals jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: model theory and literals Pat Hayes
• Re: Test cases for parseType="Literal" Art Barstow
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (#rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure) Art Barstow
• parseType="Literal" as syntactic sugar for infoset description (#rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure) Dan Connolly
• Re: model theory and literals Graham Klyne
• use cases for Literal? RSS? Dublin Core? PRISM? DAML? XAP? (#rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure) Dan Connolly
• model theory and literals Pat Hayes
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF graph model limited by RDF/xml 1.0 syntax? Graham Klyne
• Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Graham Klyne
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Graham Klyne
• Call for agenda items for this weeks telecon Brian McBride
• SYNTAX: golden triple: snail rules + draft write up Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Dan Connolly
• Re: RDF graph model limited by RDF/xml 1.0 syntax? Art Barstow
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Art Barstow
• Re: RDF graph model limited by RDF/xml 1.0 syntax? Dan Connolly
• Re: ConstraintProperty/ConstrainResource: good riddance Brian McBride
• Re: ConstraintProperty/ConstrainResource: good riddance Brian McBride
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Jan Grant

Tuesday, 9 October 2001

• Re: ConstraintProperty/ConstrainResource: good riddance jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: ConstraintProperty/ConstrainResource: good riddance Pat Hayes
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Pat Hayes
• Re: datatypes and RDF Schema Pat Hayes
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Dan Connolly
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Pat Hayes
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Pat Hayes
• ConstraintProperty/ConstrainResource: good riddance Dan Connolly
• Re: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. Pat Hayes
• Re: model theory state of play Pat Hayes
• RE: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. Pat Hayes
• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-09-28 Brian McBride
• Re: literals that do not have a single pre-speficied meaning Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Graham Klyne
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Dan Connolly
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) & changes in MT Graham Klyne
• RDF Core WG Syntax subgroup minutes for telecon 2001-10-05 Dave Beckett
• Re: Test cases for parseType="Literal" Graham Klyne
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Brian McBride
• Re: golden triples Brian McBride
• Re: Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Brian McBride
• Re: model theory state of play Brian McBride
• Re: graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?)) Brian McBride
• RE: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. Jeremy Carroll
• Re: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• RE: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Pat Hayes
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Pat Hayes
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Pat Hayes
• Re: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. Pat Hayes
• Re: golden triples jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Monday, 8 October 2001

• Re: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• golden triples Pat Hayes
• Re: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. Frank Manola
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) & changes in MT Pat Hayes
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Pat Hayes
• Re: A proposal for entailment tests Pat Hayes
• RE: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. Pat Hayes
• Re: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. Pat Hayes
• Re: Test cases for parseType="Literal" Aaron Swartz
• Test cases for parseType="Literal" Art Barstow
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Jan Grant
• RE: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Martyn Horner
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Aaron Swartz
• Re: NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. Aaron Swartz
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Martyn Horner
• Re: graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?)) Art Barstow
• Regrets, Friday's telecon. (2001-10-12) Jan Grant
• NP completeness & rdf entailment, graph identity, MT etc. Jeremy Carroll
• RE: A proposal for entailment tests Jeremy Carroll

Saturday, 6 October 2001

• Re: A proposal for entailment tests jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Graham Klyne
• Re: Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Graham Klyne
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Sergey Melnik
• Re: A proposal for entailment tests Sergey Melnik

Friday, 5 October 2001

• Re: graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?)) Pat Hayes
• Re: graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?)) Pat Hayes
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Pat Hayes
• Comments on ioctl (was: Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13)) Pat Hayes
• Re: Some controversial triples Graham Klyne
• Re: graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?)) Jan Grant
• Re: Some controversial triples Dan Brickley
• Re: A proposal for entailment tests Pat Hayes
• Some controversial triples Pat Hayes
• Re: model theory state of play Pat Hayes
• Re: graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?)) Pat Hayes
• Re: RelaxNG non-XML vs XML Infoset [Was: Re: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday] Dave Beckett
• RelaxNG non-XML vs XML Infoset [Was: Re: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday] Art Barstow
• Re: graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?)) Art Barstow

Thursday, 4 October 2001

• RE: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday Graham Klyne
• Re: Suggestion for next round of model theory document Graham Klyne
• Re: model theory state of play jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?)) Jan Grant
• graphs are sets?! (was: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?)) Aaron Swartz
• RE: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Suggestion for next round of model theory document Aaron Swartz
• Re: Charmod conformance Pat Hayes
• Re: MT comment - bagId ambiguity ... Pat Hayes
• Re: Suggestion for next round of model theory document Pat Hayes
• Re: Suggestion for next round of model theory document Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Suggestion for next round of model theory document Graham Klyne
• model theory state of play Pat Hayes
• Re: Suggestion for next round of model theory document Aaron Swartz

Wednesday, 3 October 2001

• Re: Some bad news, and some good news, on the MT revision. Graham Klyne
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Graham Klyne
• Re: Issues list update/status? Martyn Horner
• Some bad news, and some good news, on the MT revision. Pat Hayes
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Pat Hayes
• Re: Suggestion for next round of model theory document Pat Hayes
• Re: heads-up on planned changes in MT Pat Hayes
• Re: A proposal for entailment tests jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Friday, 28 September 2001

• WD Feedback Brian McBride
• Re: Issues list update/status? Brian McBride

Thursday, 27 September 2001

• Re: some errors in the MT Graham Klyne
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Graham Klyne

Monday, 24 September 2001

• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Jeremy Carroll
• Re: A proposal for entailment tests Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 2 October 2001

• delayed mail to w3c-rdfcore-wg Gerald Oskoboiny

Friday, 7 September 2001

• Re: namedNode? in predicate position? Graham Klyne
• Re: Reification in RDF MT (probably off-topic) Graham Klyne

Tuesday, 2 October 2001

• Re: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday Dan Connolly
• SYNTAX: XSLT and RelaxNG pointers Dave Beckett
• SYNTAX: bNode ids in XSLT Jeremy Carroll
• RE: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday Jan Grant
• Re: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?) Art Barstow
• Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources Graham Klyne
• Suggestion for next round of model theory document Graham Klyne
• RE: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday Jeremy Carroll
• RE: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday Jeremy Carroll
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Graham Klyne
• Re: SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday Jan Grant
• SYNTAX: RDF Syntax Telecon Friday Dave Beckett
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Jan Grant
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) & changes in MT Sergey Melnik

Monday, 1 October 2001

• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Dan Connolly
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Sergey Melnik
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Sergey Melnik
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Sergey Melnik
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Sergey Melnik
• Charmod conformance Jeremy Carroll
• MT comment - bagId ambiguity ... Jeremy Carroll
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Jan Grant
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Graham Klyne
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Graham Klyne
• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-09-28 Art Barstow
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Jeremy Carroll
• RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-09-28 Dave Beckett
• 2001-09-28#6: container test4 repost Jeremy Carroll
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Jan Grant
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Graham Klyne
• Re: Literals, language, equality Graham Klyne
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Graham Klyne

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 October 2001 22:52:57 UTC