- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 17:59:54 +0100
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 11:18 PM 10/23/01 -0500, Pat Hayes wrote:
>>Can we extend the notion of a tidy graph so that it removes duplicate
>>statements. Any untidy graph has an equivalent tidy graph, and the model
>>theory is defined in terms of that.
>
>Yes, we can do that. Everyone go on that?
I think so, but a fleeting worry about literals crossed my mind:
ex:subj ex:prop "lit" .
ex:subj ex:prop "lit" .
I can't see any actual problem here, but at some stage there seemed to be
this idea that different instances of a literal were distinct things in the
abstract syntax; e.g. so that things like:
ex:shoe shoe:size "10" .
ex:shoe shoe:label "10" .
could be interpreted appropriately.
Just checking.
#g
------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2001 13:07:53 UTC