- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 14:46:03 +0100
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 12:48 PM 10/19/01 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >If we feel it is important to be able to specify that some literals *do not* >have a lang tag then we could use xml:lang="und" (und is the ISO-639-2 tag >for undetermined). My recollection of the language tag specification (RFC3066) is that when a language tag is omitted, that value "i-default" should be assumed. This is an undefined language, but in the context of human-readable text is expected to be decipherable to one who understands international English. #g ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> ------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 19 October 2001 09:51:55 UTC