- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 17:09:56 -0500
- To: "Ron Daniel" <rdaniel@interwoven.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>Jeremy Carroll said: > >> I would not be opposed to deleting parseType="Literal" > >As I mentioned in the 2001-10-12 call, there are several uses >that have been reported. I'll repeat those for the record. > Just in general, there ought to be a way for someone to include arbitrary markup inside a piece of RDF without breaking an RDF processor. If parseType="Literal" is the only way to do that, its better to keep it than to toss it out. (Not that there might not be a better way, of course...:-) Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Monday, 15 October 2001 18:10:01 UTC