- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 22:06:08 +0100
- To: Stephen Petschulat/CanWest/IBM <spetschu@ca.ibm.com>
- CC: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Stephen, A few comments: Stephen Petschulat/CanWest/IBM wrote: [...] > 7: Propose resolution of whether graphs are sets or bags > > pat: understands model theory will use sets > pat: but will allow implementers to do what they want (sets or bags) > jeremy: prefer clear wording w/ sets only > art: we should have an explicit test case showing decision > aaron: agenda doesn't give license to processors to double up on arcs > ...Confusion over what the text allows & doesn't allow... > frank: are you suggesting if the parser finds dups it SHOULDNT remove > them? > aaron: yup > jos: concerns about merging of large graph datasets > brian: point of decision is how to treat model theory > brian: this is independent of parser/implemention decisions > > ACTION: 2001-10-26-#1 art: make a test case to illustrate set/bag decision I believe we made a decision to accept the proposal in the agenda. [...] > > 10: Status of Action 2001-08-02#7 > Dave Beckett, with help from Art and Jan, investigate how to represent > RDF/XML grammar and the specification of the transformation of RDF/XML to a > graph representation. > > Closed. The text of the syntax group's decision was: DECISION: That we will use structured English [in the Syntax document] to describe the transformation from the grammar to n-triples. The rule based formalism [done by Jeremy] will be used to verify that the structured English is correct. [...] > > DECISION: The following issues were removed from the WG's issue list: The decision was that these issues will be postponed for consideration by a future WG. [I would expect them to remain in the appropriate section of the issues list] [...] > > Propose the WG RESOLVE that the following issues be closed on the grounds > that they are resolved by the new approach taken to defining the syntax. The WG RESOLVED that that issues http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-syntax-desc-clarity http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-formal-grammar are closed on the grounds that they are resolved by the new approach taken to defining the syntax. [...] Brian
Received on Sunday, 28 October 2001 12:04:14 UTC