- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 08:11:55 -0500
- To: Martyn Horner <martyn.horner@profium.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
On Monday, October 8, 2001, at 08:02 AM, Martyn Horner wrote: > Maybe I missed something in the argument but does `denotation' > distinguish between numerals (literals) denoting numbers and > numerals (literals) denoting, say, dates. So the literal > "20001225" has, at least, two denotations? Does this invalidate > this definition? Do you mean `unique denotation'? If you don't, > how does this definition stay valid? It's my belief that the literal "20001225" denotes itself, and properties like :creationDate are really shorthand for :creationDateStringInXXXForm . -- [ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
Received on Monday, 8 October 2001 09:11:59 UTC