- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 10:30:06 +0100
- To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 07:55 PM 10/3/01 -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote: >On Tuesday, October 2, 2001, at 07:20 AM, Graham Klyne wrote: > >>As a simple fix, I would suggest placing (something like) the following >>text at the start of section 0.2 and/or 1.2: >> >>[[[ >>For the purposes of this document, the term <dfn>URI</dfn> is used to >>mean an absolute URI with an optional fragment identifier. >>]]] > >I really don't appreciate these ad-hoc redefinitions of URI. Please, if >we're going to be using something else, let's call it something else. > >Pat, can you do a search-and-replace for URI -> URI-view or something like >that. (The above text could explain the meaning of URI-view.) Aaron, in an ideal world, I would agree with you. And I don't mean to imply that the world can't be ideal in this case. Most important, I think, is to do something (anything?) to minimize gratuitous additional confusion about URIs and their derivatives. #g ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> ------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2001 05:41:59 UTC