- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:09:03 -0400
- To: Ron Daniel <rdaniel@interwoven.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 06:59:15AM -0700, Ron Daniel wrote: > Art Barstow said: > > > WRT BC, would it help to define an additional parseType value > > (e.g. "rdf:Literal")? > > BC = "Backwards compatibility"? Yes. > How would parseType="rdf:Literal" differ from parseType="Literal"? Nevermind. I withdraw my suggestion. > We should probably warn people that in the future the number of values > of the parseType attribute will increase, and those values will > probably move to QNames. However, I don't think we need to actually > define a bunch of QNames now. Yes, it would probably be good to add such a warning.
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2001 10:09:03 UTC