- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 14:03:42 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 12:45:54PM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > Brian McBride wrote: > > > > There seem to be no responses to Graham's proposed resolution text, and I assume > > therefore no dissent. This will be on Friday's telecon agenda. > > I agree with it, but I'm not quite sure how it relates to our > deliverables. Is it already reflected in the model theory > or one of the other drafts? Are you suggesting that this > text goes in the model theory spec? > > Do we have test cases? I created several test cases for this issue and announced them yesterday: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0141.html However, it seems like Agenda 12 for tomorrow's teleconf: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0173.html 12: Issue: Identity of anonymous resources PROPOSE the WG RESOLVE should have included a link to the tests: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-identity-anon-resources/ and asked the WG members to be prepared to comment on these test cases as part of the decision to RESLOVE or not.
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2001 14:03:43 UTC