- From: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 09:23:57 -0800
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- CC: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Dave Beckett wrote: > > >>>Graham Klyne said: > > I think Aaron said it better. I don't think this is an issue that should > > be postponed. > > The issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-replace-value > is recorded as: > Suggestion that the rdf:value property be replaced by rdf:toString. > > So I propose that: > We reject this suggestion as an unnecessary change > ACTION the model theory editor (Pat) to explain what rdf:value means > ACTION the primer editor (Eric) to ensure that a description of > how to use rdf:value is included. > > Are there any objections to this form of words? Yes. Datatyping and rdf:value are still subject of discussion. I'd reword the first ACTION as: to propose an interpretation of rdf:value for discussion by WG (to my knowledge, Pat is working on it already). Sergey
Received on Monday, 29 October 2001 11:57:26 UTC